Change history
-
May 13th, 2023
-
Removed Wikström, "The Music Industry in an Age of Digital Distribution," BBVA OpenMind (2014) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Milosic: "GRD's Failure," Music Business Journal (August 2015) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Masnick: "Understanding David Lowery's Lawsuit Against Spotify: The Insanity of Music Licensing," Techdirt (January 5, 2015), read all from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Mulligan: “Independents Grew Fastest on Spotify in 2019, But There’s a Twist,” MIDiA Research Blog (April 28, 2020) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Optional Reading from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Sisario: "David Lowery Sues Spotify for Copyright Infringement," The New York Times (December 29, 2015) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Globalwebindex: “Music Streaming Around The World” from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Bromley: "US Streaming Royalties Explained," Manatt (August 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Sanchez: "What Streaming Music Services Pay (Updated for 2019)," Digital Music News (December 25, 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Christman: "There's Still Money in Plastics," Billboard (September 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Christman: "'An Endless Fiasco': Indie Retailers Describe Worsening Breakdown in Getting CDs, Vinyl Delivered to Record Stores," Billboard (July 16, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Smith: "The U.S. Music Industry Grew 27% During 2021's First Half," Digital Music News (September 13, 2021) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Palmer: "The Dirty Inbox of a Touring Musician, Revealed," blog.amandapalmer.net (May 15, 2010), read all from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Palmer: "The new RECORD, ART BOOK, and TOUR," Kickstarter (Funding Ended May 31, 2012) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Lessig: "Rebuilding Free Culture: One Idea," Free Culture (2004), read pp. 282-286 (CC BY-NC 2.0) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Resnikoff: "An Insanely Detailed Discussion About the Music Modernization Act," Digital Music News (October 17, 2018), read all from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Stoltz: "The New Music Modernization Act Has a Major Fix: Older Recordings Will Belong to the Public, Orphan Recordings Will Be Heard Again," EFF (September 19, 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed The Music Modernization Act from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Rogers: "Benji Rogers, "How the Blockchain and VR Can Change the Music Industry (Part 2)", Medium -- Cuepoint (February 24, 2016), read all from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Rogers: "How the Blockchain and VR Can Change the Music Industry (Part 1)," Medium -- Cuepoint (November 23, 2015), read all from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Blockchain & VR from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Fisher: Chapter 6: "An Alternative Compensation System," Promises to Keep (2004), read pp. 1 - 22 (CC BY 3.0) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed van Rijn: “’Collecting Societies Are Struggling to Keep Up With The Influx Of Millions Of Lines Of Data,’” Music Business Worldwide (May 13, 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Changes & The Future of Music from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed US Copyright Office: "What You Need to Know About The Music Modernization Act" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Deahl: "Metadata is the Biggest Little Problem Plaguing the Music Industry," The Verge (May 29, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Gray: "Kobalt Changed the Rules of the Music Industry Using Data -- And Saved It," Wired.co.uk (May 1, 2015) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Wortham: "A Few Dollars at a Time, Patrons Support Artists on the Web," The New York Times (August 9, 2009) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Frankl-Duval & Harley-McKeown: "Investors in Search of Yield Turn to Music-Royalty Funds," Wall Street Journal (September 22, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed SKIM -- Rethink Music (an Initiative of Berklee Institute for Creative Entrepreneurship), "Fair Music: Transparency and Payment Flows in the Music Industry," Berklee College of Music (July 2015) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Changes, The MMA, & The Future of Music from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed AWAL: “Building Your Dream Team: The Music Lawyer” (January 25, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed AWAL: “Building Your Dream Team: The Booking Agent” (February 8, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed AWAL: “Building Your Dream Team: The Manager” (January 15, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Harris: “Without Small Venues, the UK Doesn’t Have a Music Industry,” Vice UK (January 17, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Kassel: "Sounds of Silence: NYC's Historic Music Venues Are Becoming History," Observer (January 14, 2014) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Ralston: "Coronavirus Might Kill The Music Industry. Maybe It Needed To Die," Esquire UK (May 8, 2020) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Sanchez: “The Live Music Industry Will Be Worth $31 Billion Worldwide by 2022,” Music Business Worldwide (October 26, 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Broussard: "The Promise and Peril of Collective Licensing," 17 Journal of Intellectual Property Law 1 (2009) (.pdf) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Cheng: "Judge: ringtones aren’t performances, so no royalties," Ars Technica (October 15, 2009) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Brown: "Downloading a song is not a performance under the Copyright Act," Internet Cases (September 29, 2010) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Future of Music Coalition: "SoundExchange Fact Sheet" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Schoonmaker: "ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, SOCAN, and GMR: The Guide to USA & Canada PROs" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Resnikoff: "A Comprehensive Comparison of Performance Rights Organizations (PROs) In the US," Digital Music News (February 20, 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Performing Rights Organizations 101 from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed US Copyright Office: In Re: Mechanical and Digital Phonorecord Rate Adjustment Proceeding , Docket No. RF 2006-1, Delivery Rate Adjustment Proceeding, (October 16, 2006) (.pdf) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Mulligan: "Songwriters Aren't Getting Paid Enough, And Here's Why," MIDiA Research Blog (September 10, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Parisi: "Copyright Royalty Board Boosts Songwriters’ Streaming Pay Nearly 50%," Variety (January 27, 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Songwriter Pay from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed U.S. Copyright Office, Circular 73, "Compulsory License for Making and Distributing Phonorecords" (.pdf) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Songtrust: "How to Start a Music Publishing Company" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed US Copyright Office: "Copyright and the Music Marketplace: A Report of the Register of Copyrights," (February 2015), read "Licensing Sound Recordings," Section III(C), pp. 43 - 55 from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Menell & Nimmer: "Sound Recordings, Works for Hire, and the Termination-of-Transfers Time Bomb" (June 17, 2010) (available at SSRN) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Lefsetz: "360 Deals," The Lefsetz Letter (November 11, 2007) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed US Copyright Office: "Federal Copyright Protection for Pre-1972 Sound Recordings: A Report of the Register of Copyrights," Executive Summary (December 2011) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed PBS Independent Lens: "Copyright Criminals," , PBS "Community Classroom" Video Module 1: "Hip-Hop Sampling" (video) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed La Monica: "Music industry sues swappers," CNN Money (September 8, 2003) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Taylor: "Napster -- 10 years of turmoil," BBC (June 26, 2009) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Waters: "Napster: 10 years of change," BBC (June 8, 2009) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed File Sharing from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed U of M Center for Entrepreneurship: "Fair Use for Copyrights" (Video) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed American University Center for Social Media: "Documentary Filmmakers’ Statement of Best Practices in Fair Use" (November 18, 2005) (Link to PDF) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Fair Use from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed GIlbert & Sisario: "Zeppelin Riff on 'Stairway' is an Original," The New York Times (June 24, 2016) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed "Taurus Case" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Aswad: "Katy Perry's 'Dark Horse' Case and Its Chilling Effect on Songwriting," Variety (August 6, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Lewis: "Beach Boys vs. Katy Perry? A warning, not a lawsuit," Pop & Hiss, The L.A. Times Music Blog (August 5, 2010) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed "Dark Horse" Case from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed U.S. Copyright Office: "Visual Arts Registration" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed US Patent & Trademark Office: "Musicians & Artists Profile" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
May 10th, 2023
-
Removed Cooke: "Yeasayer’s song-theft lawsuit against Kendrick Lamar and The Weeknd dismissed", Complete Music Update (June 3, 2020) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Spangler: "Sirius XM to Pay $210 Million to Record Companies for Pre-1972 Songs," Variety (June 26, 2015) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Beadon: "Grooveshark Loses Latest Round In Court, In A Ruling That Could Gut The DMCA's Safe Harbors," TechDirt (April 23, 2013) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Infringement in Sound Recordings from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Infringement in Compositions from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed SKIM (focus on the "middle ground") -- Crum: "The Day the (Digital) Music Died: Bridgeport, Sampling Infringement, and a Proposed Middle Ground" (2008) (Link to Open Access PDF) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed U of M Center for Entrepreneurship: "Trademark Overview" (Video) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Creative Commons: "Defining 'Noncommercial': A Study of How the Online Population Understands “Noncommercial Use - Executive Summary," pp. 10 - 13 from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Work-for-Hire from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Goh: "‘I made my peace’: fans divided over Taylor Swift’s re-recording project," The Guardian (April 15, 2021) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Ingham: "Taylor Swift Plans to Re-Record Her Hits. Here’s What She Might Be Facing," Rolling Stone (December 9, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Re-Recording Songs To Make New Records from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed U of M Center for Entrepreneurship: "Works for Hire & Copyright Ownership" (Video) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Part II from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed U of M Center for Entrepreneurship: "Idea & Expression Dichotomy" (Video) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Carnes: "Has Music Piracy Killed the 'Recording Artist'?," The Huffington Post (January 3, 2011) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Part I from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Tunecore: "How Not To Get Screwed: The Six Legal Rights That Drive the Digital Music Business" (2011) (Link to PDF) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Optional Reading from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Ayers: "Breaking Down 'Those Color Lines' in a Music Industry That Drew Them," New York Times (June 4, 2020) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
October 3rd, 2022
-
September 7th, 2022
-
August 24th, 2022
-
December 6th, 2021
-
November 1st, 2021
-
April 29th, 2020
-
Casebook first published.
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed
for sharing and re-use.
Material included from the American Legal Institute is reproduced with permission and is exempted from the open license.