Change history
-
May 13th, 2023
-
Removed Wikström, "The Music Industry in an Age of Digital Distribution," BBVA OpenMind (2014) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Milosic: "GRD's Failure," Music Business Journal (August 2015) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Masnick: "Understanding David Lowery's Lawsuit Against Spotify: The Insanity of Music Licensing," Techdirt (January 5, 2015), read all from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Mulligan: “Independents Grew Fastest on Spotify in 2019, But There’s a Twist,” MIDiA Research Blog (April 28, 2020) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Optional Reading from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Sisario: "David Lowery Sues Spotify for Copyright Infringement," The New York Times (December 29, 2015) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Globalwebindex: “Music Streaming Around The World” from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Bromley: "US Streaming Royalties Explained," Manatt (August 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Sanchez: "What Streaming Music Services Pay (Updated for 2019)," Digital Music News (December 25, 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Christman: "There's Still Money in Plastics," Billboard (September 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Christman: "'An Endless Fiasco': Indie Retailers Describe Worsening Breakdown in Getting CDs, Vinyl Delivered to Record Stores," Billboard (July 16, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Smith: "The U.S. Music Industry Grew 27% During 2021's First Half," Digital Music News (September 13, 2021) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Palmer: "The Dirty Inbox of a Touring Musician, Revealed," blog.amandapalmer.net (May 15, 2010), read all from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Palmer: "The new RECORD, ART BOOK, and TOUR," Kickstarter (Funding Ended May 31, 2012) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Lessig: "Rebuilding Free Culture: One Idea," Free Culture (2004), read pp. 282-286 (CC BY-NC 2.0) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Resnikoff: "An Insanely Detailed Discussion About the Music Modernization Act," Digital Music News (October 17, 2018), read all from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Stoltz: "The New Music Modernization Act Has a Major Fix: Older Recordings Will Belong to the Public, Orphan Recordings Will Be Heard Again," EFF (September 19, 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed The Music Modernization Act from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Rogers: "Benji Rogers, "How the Blockchain and VR Can Change the Music Industry (Part 2)", Medium -- Cuepoint (February 24, 2016), read all from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Rogers: "How the Blockchain and VR Can Change the Music Industry (Part 1)," Medium -- Cuepoint (November 23, 2015), read all from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Blockchain & VR from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Fisher: Chapter 6: "An Alternative Compensation System," Promises to Keep (2004), read pp. 1 - 22 (CC BY 3.0) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed van Rijn: “’Collecting Societies Are Struggling to Keep Up With The Influx Of Millions Of Lines Of Data,’” Music Business Worldwide (May 13, 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Changes & The Future of Music from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed US Copyright Office: "What You Need to Know About The Music Modernization Act" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Deahl: "Metadata is the Biggest Little Problem Plaguing the Music Industry," The Verge (May 29, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Gray: "Kobalt Changed the Rules of the Music Industry Using Data -- And Saved It," Wired.co.uk (May 1, 2015) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Wortham: "A Few Dollars at a Time, Patrons Support Artists on the Web," The New York Times (August 9, 2009) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Frankl-Duval & Harley-McKeown: "Investors in Search of Yield Turn to Music-Royalty Funds," Wall Street Journal (September 22, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed SKIM -- Rethink Music (an Initiative of Berklee Institute for Creative Entrepreneurship), "Fair Music: Transparency and Payment Flows in the Music Industry," Berklee College of Music (July 2015) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Changes, The MMA, & The Future of Music from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed AWAL: “Building Your Dream Team: The Music Lawyer” (January 25, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed AWAL: “Building Your Dream Team: The Booking Agent” (February 8, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed AWAL: “Building Your Dream Team: The Manager” (January 15, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Harris: “Without Small Venues, the UK Doesn’t Have a Music Industry,” Vice UK (January 17, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Kassel: "Sounds of Silence: NYC's Historic Music Venues Are Becoming History," Observer (January 14, 2014) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Ralston: "Coronavirus Might Kill The Music Industry. Maybe It Needed To Die," Esquire UK (May 8, 2020) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Sanchez: “The Live Music Industry Will Be Worth $31 Billion Worldwide by 2022,” Music Business Worldwide (October 26, 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Broussard: "The Promise and Peril of Collective Licensing," 17 Journal of Intellectual Property Law 1 (2009) (.pdf) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Cheng: "Judge: ringtones aren’t performances, so no royalties," Ars Technica (October 15, 2009) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Brown: "Downloading a song is not a performance under the Copyright Act," Internet Cases (September 29, 2010) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Future of Music Coalition: "SoundExchange Fact Sheet" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Schoonmaker: "ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, SOCAN, and GMR: The Guide to USA & Canada PROs" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Resnikoff: "A Comprehensive Comparison of Performance Rights Organizations (PROs) In the US," Digital Music News (February 20, 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Performing Rights Organizations 101 from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed US Copyright Office: In Re: Mechanical and Digital Phonorecord Rate Adjustment Proceeding , Docket No. RF 2006-1, Delivery Rate Adjustment Proceeding, (October 16, 2006) (.pdf) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Mulligan: "Songwriters Aren't Getting Paid Enough, And Here's Why," MIDiA Research Blog (September 10, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Parisi: "Copyright Royalty Board Boosts Songwriters’ Streaming Pay Nearly 50%," Variety (January 27, 2018) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Songwriter Pay from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed U.S. Copyright Office, Circular 73, "Compulsory License for Making and Distributing Phonorecords" (.pdf) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Songtrust: "How to Start a Music Publishing Company" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed US Copyright Office: "Copyright and the Music Marketplace: A Report of the Register of Copyrights," (February 2015), read "Licensing Sound Recordings," Section III(C), pp. 43 - 55 from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Menell & Nimmer: "Sound Recordings, Works for Hire, and the Termination-of-Transfers Time Bomb" (June 17, 2010) (available at SSRN) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Lefsetz: "360 Deals," The Lefsetz Letter (November 11, 2007) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed US Copyright Office: "Federal Copyright Protection for Pre-1972 Sound Recordings: A Report of the Register of Copyrights," Executive Summary (December 2011) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed PBS Independent Lens: "Copyright Criminals," , PBS "Community Classroom" Video Module 1: "Hip-Hop Sampling" (video) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed La Monica: "Music industry sues swappers," CNN Money (September 8, 2003) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Taylor: "Napster -- 10 years of turmoil," BBC (June 26, 2009) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Waters: "Napster: 10 years of change," BBC (June 8, 2009) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed File Sharing from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed U of M Center for Entrepreneurship: "Fair Use for Copyrights" (Video) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed American University Center for Social Media: "Documentary Filmmakers’ Statement of Best Practices in Fair Use" (November 18, 2005) (Link to PDF) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Fair Use from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed GIlbert & Sisario: "Zeppelin Riff on 'Stairway' is an Original," The New York Times (June 24, 2016) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed "Taurus Case" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Aswad: "Katy Perry's 'Dark Horse' Case and Its Chilling Effect on Songwriting," Variety (August 6, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Lewis: "Beach Boys vs. Katy Perry? A warning, not a lawsuit," Pop & Hiss, The L.A. Times Music Blog (August 5, 2010) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed "Dark Horse" Case from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed U.S. Copyright Office: "Visual Arts Registration" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed US Patent & Trademark Office: "Musicians & Artists Profile" from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
May 10th, 2023
-
Removed Cooke: "Yeasayer’s song-theft lawsuit against Kendrick Lamar and The Weeknd dismissed", Complete Music Update (June 3, 2020) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Spangler: "Sirius XM to Pay $210 Million to Record Companies for Pre-1972 Songs," Variety (June 26, 2015) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Beadon: "Grooveshark Loses Latest Round In Court, In A Ruling That Could Gut The DMCA's Safe Harbors," TechDirt (April 23, 2013) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Infringement in Sound Recordings from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Infringement in Compositions from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed SKIM (focus on the "middle ground") -- Crum: "The Day the (Digital) Music Died: Bridgeport, Sampling Infringement, and a Proposed Middle Ground" (2008) (Link to Open Access PDF) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed U of M Center for Entrepreneurship: "Trademark Overview" (Video) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Creative Commons: "Defining 'Noncommercial': A Study of How the Online Population Understands “Noncommercial Use - Executive Summary," pp. 10 - 13 from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Work-for-Hire from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Goh: "‘I made my peace’: fans divided over Taylor Swift’s re-recording project," The Guardian (April 15, 2021) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Ingham: "Taylor Swift Plans to Re-Record Her Hits. Here’s What She Might Be Facing," Rolling Stone (December 9, 2019) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Re-Recording Songs To Make New Records from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed U of M Center for Entrepreneurship: "Works for Hire & Copyright Ownership" (Video) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Part II from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed U of M Center for Entrepreneurship: "Idea & Expression Dichotomy" (Video) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Carnes: "Has Music Piracy Killed the 'Recording Artist'?," The Huffington Post (January 3, 2011) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Part I from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Tunecore: "How Not To Get Screwed: The Six Legal Rights That Drive the Digital Music Business" (2011) (Link to PDF) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Optional Reading from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
Removed Ayers: "Breaking Down 'Those Color Lines' in a Music Industry That Drew Them," New York Times (June 4, 2020) from Music IP & Stakeholders
-
October 3rd, 2022
-
September 7th, 2022
-
August 24th, 2022
-
December 6th, 2021
-
November 1st, 2021
-
April 29th, 2020
-
Casebook first published.
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed
for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts.
Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.