Comparative Patent Law

PatentX:NLUD

  • Arul George Scaria (National Law School of India University, Bengaluru)

This syllabus is based on the PatentX course syllabus prepared by Prof. William Fisher and Prof. Ruth Okediji. The course uses a hybrid pedagogical approach with synchronous and asynchronous learning.

4 Module 4: Utility and Disclosure 4 Module 4: Utility and Disclosure

4.1. Lecture videos

Lecture videos

4.2. Lemley, Mark A., and Dan L. Burk. "Policy levers in patent law." Virginia Law Review 89 (2003): 1575.

Lemley, Mark A., and Dan L. Burk. "Policy levers in patent law." Virginia Law Review 89 (2003): 1575.

4.3. Novartis AG and others v. Union Of India & Others, (SC, 2013)

Novartis AG and others v. Union Of India & Others, (SC, 2013)

4.4. Merck v. Glenmark (Delhi HC, 2015)

Merck v. Glenmark (Delhi HC, 2015)

4.5. Farbewerke Hoechest v. Unichem (Bombay HC, 1968)

Farbewerke Hoechest v. Unichem (Bombay HC, 1968)

4.6. The Alleppey Company Ltd. v. The Controller of Patents (IPAB, 2010)

The Alleppey Company Ltd. v. The Controller of Patents (IPAB, 2010)

4.7. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals v. Kymab Ltd., 2020 UKSC 27

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals v. Kymab Ltd., 2020 UKSC 27