Comparative Patent Law

PatentX:NLUD

  • Arul George Scaria (National Law School of India University, Bengaluru)

This syllabus is based on the PatentX course syllabus prepared by Prof. William Fisher and Prof. Ruth Okediji. The course uses a hybrid pedagogical approach with synchronous and asynchronous learning.

14 Module 14: Standard-Essential Patents 14 Module 14: Standard-Essential Patents

14.1. Lemley, Mark A., and Timothy Simcoe. "How essential are standard-essential patents." Cornell L. Rev. 104 (2018): 607.

Lemley, Mark A., and Timothy Simcoe. "How essential are standard-essential patents." Cornell L. Rev. 104 (2018): 607.

14.2. Contreras, Jorge L. "Global Rate Setting: A Solution for Standards-Essential Patents." Wash. L. Rev. 94 (2019): 701.

Contreras, Jorge L. "Global Rate Setting: A Solution for Standards-Essential Patents." Wash. L. Rev. 94 (2019): 701.

14.3. Philips v. Rajesh Bansal (Delhi HC, 2018)

Philips v. Rajesh Bansal (Delhi HC, 2018)

14.4. Ericsson v CCI (Delhi HC, March 2016)

Ericsson v CCI (Delhi HC, March 2016)

14.5. Ericsson v Intex (Delhi HC, 2015)

Ericsson v Intex (Delhi HC, 2015)

14.6. Intex v Ericsson (CCI order, 2014)

Intex v Ericsson (CCI order, 2014)

14.7. Micromax v. Ericsson (CCI order, 2013)

Micromax v. Ericsson (CCI order, 2013)

14.8. Unwired Planet v. Huawei (EWCA, 2018)

Unwired Planet v. Huawei (EWCA, 2018)