Main Content
Aero (SUMMARY) - G. Frosio, The Supreme Court Finds Aereo a Direct Infringer, Justice Brandeis (And Scalia) Dissent, CIS Blog, July 1, 2014
13.1.4
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2014/07/supreme-court-finds-aereo-direct-infringer-justice-brandeis-and-scalia-dissent
Aero (SUMMARY) - G. Frosio, The Supreme Court Finds Aereo a Direct Infringer, Justice Brandeis (And Scalia) Dissent, CIS Blog, July 1, 2014
9.4.4
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2014/07/supreme-court-finds-aereo-direct-infringer-justice-brandeis-and-scalia-dissent
Allison S. Brehm and Eric W. May, Copyright Protection for Fictional Characters, 84 PTCJ 285 (2012)
4.1.2
http://static.ow.ly/docs/Bloomberg%20Law%20-%20Document%20-%20Copyright%20Protection%20for%20Fictional%20Characters,%20Patent,%20Trademark%20&%20Copyri_LOd.pdf
American Historical Association, Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct, #4: Plagiarism (2005) (OPTIONAL)
3.2.2
http://www.historians.org/pubs/free/ProfessionalStandards.cfm#Plagiarism
Andreas Rahmatian, Non-assignability of Authors' Rights in Austria and Germany and its Relation to the Concept of Creativity in Civil Law Jurisdictions Generally: a Comparison with UK Copyright Law, 11(5) Entertainment Law Review 95-103 (2000)
6.2.5.1
http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/38136
Andreas Rahmatian, Originality in UK Copyright Law The Old ‘‘Skill and Labour’’ Doctrine Under Pressure, 44 IIC (2013) 4–34
2.1.5
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40319-012-0003-4.pdf
Authors Guild v. Google, 804 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2015)
10.2.5
http://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/13-4829/13-4829-2015-10-16.pdf?ts=1445005805
Bernt Hugenholtz et al, Never Forever: Why Extending the Term of Protection of Sound Recordings is a Bad Idea, 4 EIPR 174 (2008)
7.2.5.3
http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1067
BOP Consulting with DotEcon, International Comparison of Approaches to Online Copyright Infringement (report commissioned by the UK Intellectual Property Office, February 9, 2015)
13.1.13.5
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/international-comparison-of-approaches-to-online-copyright-enforcement
CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada (SCC 2004) (Canada)
2.1.8.3
http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2125/index.do?r=AAAAAQATQ2FuYWRhIEV2aWRlbmNlIEFjdAE
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use. Material included from the American Legal Institute is reproduced with permission and is exempted from the open license.