Main Content
Aero (SUMMARY) - G. Frosio, The Supreme Court Finds Aereo a Direct Infringer, Justice Brandeis (And Scalia) Dissent, CIS Blog, July 1, 2014
13.1.4
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2014/07/supreme-court-finds-aereo-direct-infringer-justice-brandeis-and-scalia-dissent
Aero (SUMMARY) - G. Frosio, The Supreme Court Finds Aereo a Direct Infringer, Justice Brandeis (And Scalia) Dissent, CIS Blog, July 1, 2014
9.4.4
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2014/07/supreme-court-finds-aereo-direct-infringer-justice-brandeis-and-scalia-dissent
Allison S. Brehm and Eric W. May, Copyright Protection for Fictional Characters, 84 PTCJ 285 (2012)
4.1.2
http://static.ow.ly/docs/Bloomberg%20Law%20-%20Document%20-%20Copyright%20Protection%20for%20Fictional%20Characters,%20Patent,%20Trademark%20&%20Copyri_LOd.pdf
American Historical Association, Statement on Standards of Professional Conduct, #4: Plagiarism (2005) (OPTIONAL)
3.2.2
http://www.historians.org/pubs/free/ProfessionalStandards.cfm#Plagiarism
Andreas Rahmatian, Non-assignability of Authors' Rights in Austria and Germany and its Relation to the Concept of Creativity in Civil Law Jurisdictions Generally: a Comparison with UK Copyright Law, 11(5) Entertainment Law Review 95-103 (2000)
6.2.5.1
http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/38136
Andreas Rahmatian, Originality in UK Copyright Law The Old ‘‘Skill and Labour’’ Doctrine Under Pressure, 44 IIC (2013) 4–34
2.1.5
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40319-012-0003-4.pdf
Authors Guild v. Google, 804 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2015)
10.2.5
http://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/13-4829/13-4829-2015-10-16.pdf?ts=1445005805
Bernt Hugenholtz et al, Never Forever: Why Extending the Term of Protection of Sound Recordings is a Bad Idea, 4 EIPR 174 (2008)
7.2.5.3
http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1067
BOP Consulting with DotEcon, International Comparison of Approaches to Online Copyright Infringement (report commissioned by the UK Intellectual Property Office, February 9, 2015)
13.1.13.5
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/international-comparison-of-approaches-to-online-copyright-enforcement
CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada (SCC 2004) (Canada)
2.1.8.3
http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2125/index.do?r=AAAAAQATQ2FuYWRhIEV2aWRlbmNlIEFjdAE
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.