1 Introduction 1 Introduction
1.1 Sources of Contract Law 1.1 Sources of Contract Law
Before the American Revolution, the American states were British colonies. English law, including English contract law, applied in each of the thirteen colonies. The Revolutionary War freed the colonies from the British crown, but each of the new states continued to apply primarily English contract law. The federal government came into existence in the 1780s as a government of limited powers. Various attempts have since been made to promulgate a federal contract law, but none have as yet succeeded.
That means that states control contract law. Contract law is fashioned by state courts and state legislatures. The English law of contracts was created one case at a time in England's courts, and our states have generally carried on that tradition. Court-created law is usually called "common law."1
State legislatures also get in the act by passing statutes that codify or change the common law. Law promulgated by legislatures is called "statutory" law as opposed to "common law.” Most of the law we study will be common or statutory law, adopted or promulgated by state courts or state legislatures. Here and there a federal statute or regulation will intrude.
In the last hundred years, two groups of lawyers have somewhat successfully influenced the process of contract-law-making in America. The first is the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL). The Conference includes 50 state-appointed commissioners who draft and recommend legislation to state legislatures.
The second group is the American Law Institute (ALI). The ALI is an organization of lawyers, judges, and legal academics dedicated to clarifying, simplifying, and reforming law. The ALI's primary vehicle for accomplishing its mission is to "restate" the common law; that is, to boil down all the common law from court opinions into black letter rules that lawyers can better understand.
Sometimes the ALI merely restates the common law. The first Restatement of Contracts, published in 1932, tried to do that. The first Restatement of Contracts.2 The Restatement (Second) of Contracts was published in 1981.3 But often the ALI “restates” law what isn’t yet law, in the hope that courts will adopt the ALI position. The Restatement (Second) (affectionately referred to as “R2K”) proposed more of this reforming than did the first Restatement. But courts have drawn (and will draw) on the wisdom of both documents.
The Restatement and Restatement (Second) are not law but only commentary, unless something in them has been adopted by courts. And they often have been ratified by courts. The common law comes from decided cases, as it always has. Sections and comments of the R2K are sometimes referred to in bold in this book. When you find a reference in bold (for examples, see pages listed with a R2K section in the Table of Contents), please find the materials referred to in the statutory supplement recommended by your teacher and study them as if they were written out in this book itself. Where possible, I have tried to include sections as part of this book. Make sure also to read the comments and illustrations, which are often... illustrative.
Between 1940 and 1952, NCCUSL and the ALI teamed up to draft the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which they then proposed to state legislatures. This statute has been wildly successful: eventually all fifty state legislatures passed it, with only some local variation (though Louisiana did not pass Article Two). The result is that for most commercial transactions, the law of all fifty states approaches uniformity (there are non-uniform amendments). The UCC governs such things as sales of goods (Article 2), negotiable instruments (Article 3), and secured transactions (Article 9). Excerpts from the UCC are included in these materials, but I highly recommend taking the Commercial Law course offered at Howard by Professors Mtima or myself. It combines “Sales” (Article 2) and “Secured Transactions” (Article 9).
The rest of contract law is unspoken. It exists in the practices, morals, prejudices, theories, and goals of the lawyers, judges, litigants, and facts involved in its making and application. In this course you will study not only the rules themselves, which make up the body of contract law proper, but also the culture in which contract law exists, is applied, and is a part.
1.2 How to use these materials 1.2 How to use these materials
1.2.1 Success in this class 1.2.1 Success in this class
This building blocks for this class primarily consists of reading case law, the restatement, and statutes. In class, we will practice applying the rules derived from these sources to new fact patterns.
When you read the sources of law, you ought to do so carefully. It's not enough to read them once, or in passing. I encourage you to read the material at least three times before class. And then if you hear unexpected things in class, read it again after class.
When you read cases, ask yourself questions like:
- What are the parties arguing about?
- What rule is the court using to decide who should win?
- What does the court "hold" (e.g. who should win)?
- Why does the court rule for the plaintiff or the defendant? (e.g. what was the rationale)?
In class, I will start the year off asking you all the same questions* every day, including:
- What was the issue?
- What facts did the court consider relevant to deciding the issue?
- What rule does the court use to decide the issue?
- What was the holding?
- What was the rationale?
You'll get bored of me hearing these questions. But once you start answering them without my prompting, the course will shift. And we will go deeper into the material. We'll go from "How do you read a case and understand what happened?" to "And how do we apply this knowlege from the case we read to new sets of facts?"
* Consider these the core things you need in your "brief" of the case.
1.2.2. How to read a legal opinion (and brief one)
Section III is particularly useful for briefing
1.3 What are we doing here anyway? 1.3 What are we doing here anyway?
Students often think that contracts is going to be no fun. They don't see the connections between why they came to law school, particularly a law school like Howard, and contract law.
But contract law is about the use of state power to compel people to act (either to fulfill the terms of their agreements or, more commonly, to pay money if they do not (e.g. they breach their contracts)).
Who drafts the contracts most consumers sign? In whose interests are these contracts drafted? And since the answers to these questions are often: highly-paid teams of fancy lawyers looking out for their corporate clients, it bears thinking about how contract law is used to the detriment of every day people.
1.3.1 Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 1: Contract defined 1.3.1 Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 1: Contract defined
A contract is a promise or a set of promises for the breach of which the law gives a remedy, or the performance of which the law in some way recognizes as a duty.
1.3.2. Visualizing our year together
1.4. On why contracts might be less boring than you fear...
ContractsProf Blog post
"Contract law provides a particularly rich and interesting backdrop for the analysis of racial assumptions, in part because of its racially-charged history and the ways in which the doctrine is inextricably linked to race, which gives rise to many opportunities throughout the course to incorporate critical perspectives into the analysis of the cases while teaching the core legal doctrine."
IMO, contract law is about economic power and is often about the leverage obtained because of power imblances. Learn how this area of law affects everything from plea bargains to cell phone contracts.
1.5. Contract Law & Racial Inequality: A Primer
1.6 Analogic reasoning 1.6 Analogic reasoning
https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3199&context=facpub
1.7. Analogical Reasoning, in Susan A. McMahon & Sonya G. Bonneau, Legal Writing in Context (Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press 2017)
An article about reasoning by analogy