Main Content
Torts: Basic Fluency in a Fundamental Legal Language (Revised)
Kubert v. Best ("The Distracting Texter Case")
Didnt' the texter's actions foreseeably create a risk of harm? Why is she found not to have an ordinary duty to meet the standard of a reasonable person on that basis? How does the court reason about duty in this case?
New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
432 N.J. Super. 495, 75 A.3d 1214
2013-08-27
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.