Detailed Roadmap to Core Readings

The big picture questions are whether the usual lawyer ethical rules do or should apply to AGs, and whether there are additional ethical rules that don't apply to other lawyers but do or should apply to AGs given their role to protect the public interest.

We begin with the Davids article, which addresses the first question (ignore the fact that the nomenclature for the model rules has changed -- the concepts remain constant). The Weinstein article and the FERC case address the second question. For Weinstein, ask yourself if you see a consistent approach or governing rule.

We then consider a trio of cases that ask who is the client, and when is it proper, if ever, to throw the client under the bus in favor of the public interest -- AL AG Bill Pryor and Chief Justice Roy Moore; MA AG Maura Healy and "who speaks for the children"; and a hapless AZ AAG defending a state prison.

Next, we wade into the most over-used word these days -- "weaponization" -- to look at the increasingly recent use of bar complaints and ethics rules to go after AGs and DAs in IN, TX, MO, NY, and GA. Are these complaints proper, and what is the consequence of this new frontier?

Finally, we put all of our new-found knowledge about AGs and ethics into practice with four role-playing hypos.

This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.