Main Content
Detailed Roadmap to Core Readings
Largely beginning with the litigation over same-sex marriage, the issue of a duty to defend by the AG has taken on greater prominence. The Shaw law review article discusses the theories behind an AG's refusal to defend a state statute or constitutional provision. The then AGs of CO and IN argue that AGs ordinarily should defend such statutes and provisions even when they disagree with them on the merits. The OH AG took yet another approach in the Supreme Court, namely, filing briefs on both sides of an issue.
The remaining examples show that AGs on both sides of the political spectrum are willing to refuse to defend the state in various circumstances.
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.