Internet Platforms, GDPR and IP Enforcement, CEIPI Advanced Training (2018)

Syllabus

  • Giancarlo Frosio (University of Turin, Nexa Center, Center for International Intellectual Property Studies, Stanford CIS)

This syllabus includes materials specifically designed for the CEIPI Advance Training Program on Internet Platforms, GDPR and IP Enforcement. It is a resource aiming at blending together international, European and US legislation and case law. References to some other jurisdictions have been included as well. A few doctrinal pieces complete the syllabus.

5 Module 3-4 - Secondary Liability for Trademark Infringement 5 Module 3-4 - Secondary Liability for Trademark Infringement

Trademarks

5.1. Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Secondary Liability for Online Trademark Infringement: The International Landscape, 37 COLUM. J.L. & ARTS 463 (2014),

Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Secondary Liability for Online Trademark Infringement: The International Landscape, 37 COLUM. J.L. & ARTS 463 (2014),

5.2. Martin Senftleben,. An Uneasy Case for Notice and Takedown: Context-Specific Trademark (2012)

Martin Senftleben,. An Uneasy Case for Notice and Takedown: Context-Specific Trademark (2012)

5.3. Graeme Dinwoodie, Rochelle Dreyfuss & Annette Kur, The law applicable to secondary liability in intellectual property infringement cases, 42 NYU JILP 201 (2009)

Graeme Dinwoodie, Rochelle Dreyfuss & Annette Kur, The law applicable to secondary liability in intellectual property infringement cases, 42 NYU JILP 201 (2009)

5.4 Europe 5.4 Europe

5.4.1. Tommy Hilfiger Licensing v. Delta Center, C-494/15 (ECJ July 7, 2016)

Tommy Hilfiger Licensing v. Delta Center, C-494/15 (ECJ July 7, 2016)

5.4.2. Google France SARL and Google Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier SA, C-236/08, Google France SARL v. Viaticum SA and Luteciel SARL (C-237/08) and Google France SARL v. Centre national de recherche en relations humaines (CNRRH) SARL and Others, C-238/08, joined cases (ECJ, March 23, 2010) (Europe)

Google France SARL and Google Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier SA, C-236/08, Google France SARL v. Viaticum SA and Luteciel SARL (C-237/08) and Google France SARL v. Centre national de recherche en relations humaines (CNRRH) SARL and Others, C-238/08, joined cases (ECJ, March 23, 2010) (Europe)

5.4.3. L'Oreal SA and Others v. eBay International AG and Others, C-324/09 (ECJ, July 12, 2011) (Europe)

L'Oreal SA and Others v. eBay International AG and Others, C-324/09 (ECJ, July 12, 2011) (Europe)

5.4.4. Annette Kur, Secondary Liability for Trademark Infringement on the Internet: The Situation in Germany and the EU, 37 Colum. J.L. & Arts 525 (2014)

Annette Kur, Secondary Liability for Trademark Infringement on the Internet: The Situation in Germany and the EU, 37 Colum. J.L. & Arts 525 (2014)

5.5 United Kingdom 5.5 United Kingdom

5.5.1. Cartier Int. v BSkyB Ltd. [2016] EWCA Civ 658

Cartier Int. v BSkyB Ltd. [2016] EWCA Civ 658

5.5.2. Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd [2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch)

Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd [2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch)

5.6 United States 5.6 United States

5.6.1. Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc. (9th Cir. 2011)

Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc. (9th Cir. 2011)

5.6.2. Tiffany and Co. v. eBay Inc., 600 F3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010)

Tiffany and Co. v. eBay Inc., 600 F3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010)

5.6.3. Barton Beebe, Tiffany and Rosetta Stone - Intermediary Liability in U.S. Trademark Law, 41 CIPA Journal 192 (2012)

Barton Beebe, Tiffany and Rosetta Stone - Intermediary Liability in U.S. Trademark Law, 41 CIPA Journal 192 (2012)

5.7 Additional Readings 5.7 Additional Readings

5.7.1 Matthias Leistner, Common Principles of Secondary Liability? in A. Ohly (ed), Common Principles of European Intellectual Property Law, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2012, 117 ff. 5.7.1 Matthias Leistner, Common Principles of Secondary Liability? in A. Ohly (ed), Common Principles of European Intellectual Property Law, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2012, 117 ff.

citation

5.7.2 Annette Kur and Martin Senftleben, European Trade Mark Law. A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017, pp. 691 ff. 5.7.2 Annette Kur and Martin Senftleben, European Trade Mark Law. A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017, pp. 691 ff.

Citation

5.7.3. Eric Goldman, Attempted Trademark Workaround to 47 USC 230 Immunity Fails Badly Ascentive v. PissedConsumer, Technology and Marketing Law Blog, January 15, 2012

Eric Goldman, Attempted Trademark Workaround to 47 USC 230 Immunity Fails Badly Ascentive v. PissedConsumer, Technology and Marketing Law Blog, January 15, 2012

5.7.4. Ascentive v. Opinion Corp., 2011 WL 6181452 (EDNY 2010)

Ascentive v. Opinion Corp., 2011 WL 6181452 (EDNY 2010)