“Herrick v. Grindr: Why Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act Must be Fixed” by Carrie Goldberg, Lawfare (2019).

Herrick v. Grindr provides a case study of some of the harms permitted under § 230, as well as attempts to circumvent it by plaintiffs. Do you agree that this case reveals that § 230 must be fixed? What are the dangers of changing § 230 in the ways Goldberg proposes?

This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.