Defense Brief on Appeal of Trial Court's Exclusion of Expert Testimony on False Confessions

This is an excerpt of the defendant's brief in New York v. Evans (2016). This portion of the brief includes portions of the argument explaining why the trial court was wrong to exclude the proposed defense expert on false confessions. When reading this, focus on (a) the factors that contribute to false confessions and (b) observe where you find the lawyer's arguments, use of authority, and language choices more or less persuasive.

The full brief is available on Westlaw at 2015 WL 10713575 and I also posted it on Moodle under this class heading. The defense attorney who authored the brief is Glenn Garber. If you read the version on Moodle, please read pdf page 41 (which is page 31 on the brief document) through pdf page 63 (page 53 on the brief document) and pdf page 73 (63 on brief) through pdf page 83 (72 on brief).

This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.