United States v. Tibbs

D.C. Superior Court (2019)

This 2019 opinion is useful because it: (a) describes the differences between the Daubert and Frye standards; (b) provides an unusual example of a judge delving into the Daubert factors; and (c) offers a critique of courts’ Daubert analyses.

(You can skip pages 54-56.)

This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use. Material included from the American Legal Institute is reproduced with permission and is exempted from the open license.