Main Content

Casebook Credits History Find

Content from the following sources has been used in the creation of this casebook:

  • Archive

    Authors:
    • 1: Copyright and Cover original
    • 2: Introduction - Becoming a Great Lawyer original
    • 2.1: Introduction Word Cloud original
    • 2.2: What It Means to Be a Great Lawyer original
    • 2.4: Preamble to the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct original
    • 2.5: The Lawyer's Role With Clients and Society original
    • 2.6: Civil Procedure and the Lawyer's Role original
    • 2.6.1: Ethical Duties in Litigation original
    • 2.6.2: Sidebar: Before You Read Your First Case original
    • 2.6.3: In Re Snyder, 472 U.S. 634 (1985) original
    • 2.6.4: Notes on In Re Snyder original
    • 2.6.5: Sidebar: Finding Definitions for Legal Terms original
    • 2.7: Beyond Doctrine original
    • 2.7.1: Beyond Doctrine: Understanding the Client's Needs and Being a Problem Solver original
    • 2.7.2: Beyond Doctrine: Culture original
    • 2.7.3: Beyond Doctrine: Thinking Like a Lawyer original
    • 2.7.6: Beyond Doctrine: US History original
    • 2.7.7: Beyond Doctrine: US Governmental Structure original
    • 2.8: Review and Takeaways original
    • 3: Dispute Resolution: The Big Picture original
    • 3.1: Dispute Resolution Wordcloud original
    • 3.2: 'Alternative' Dispute Resolution original
    • 3.2.1: Introduction to 'Alternative' Dispute Resolution original
    • 3.2.2: Fox: Addressing Modes of Conflict Resolution In Creating Agreements original
    • 3.2.3: Notes on Dispute Resolution Methods original
    • 3.2.4: Binding Arbitration original
    • 3.2.5: AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion original
    • 3.2.6: Notes on AT&T Mobility original
    • 3.3: Government Run Dispute Resolution Systems - Courts original
    • 3.3.1: Introduction to Courts - Government Run Dispute Resolution original
    • 3.3.2: Civil Law versus Common Law Court Systems original
    • 3.3.3: The Development of the Common Law original
    • 3.3.4: Law and Equity original
    • 3.4: The US Legal System original
    • 3.4.1: The US Legal System - Quick Overview original
    • 3.4.2: The US Legal System - After the Fact Regulation and Adversarial Legalism original
    • 3.4.3: The US Legal System - The Course of a Case original
    • 3.4.4: The US Legal System - Operative Strategic Questions original
    • 3.5: Dispute Resolution: Review and Takeaways original
    • 4: Defining The Objective: Remedies, Appeals, Enforcement of Judgments original
    • 4.1: Defining the Objective Wordcloud original
    • 4.2: Introduction original
    • 4.3: Remedies - What Are You Asking For original
    • 4.3.1: Overview of Remedies original
    • 4.3.2: Equitable Remedies original
    • 4.3.2.1: Introduction to Equitable Remedies: Preliminary Injunctions and TROs original
    • 4.3.2.2: FRCP 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders original
    • 4.3.2.3: Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. original
    • 4.3.2.4: Notes on Winter v. NRDC original
    • 4.3.3: Provisional Remedies - The Concept of Opportunity To Be Heard original
    • 4.3.3.1: Rule 64 – Seizing a Person or Property original
    • 4.3.3.2: Opportunity to be Heard original
    • 4.3.3.3: Connecticut v. Doehr original
    • 4.3.3.4: Notes on Opportunity to Be Heard original
    • 4.3.4: Questions on Remedies original
    • 4.4: Enforcement of Judgments original
    • 4.4.1: Overview: Enforcement of Domestic Judgments, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, and Enforcement of US Judgments Abroad original
    • 4.4.2: Global Materials Technologies, Inc., v. Dazheng Metal Fibre Co. Ltd. et al original
    • 4.4.3: Review of Enforcement of Judgments original
    • 4.4.4: Questions on Enforcement of Judgments original
    • 4.5: Appeals and Review original
    • 4.5.1: Overview of Appellate Process original
    • 4.5.2: The Final Judgment Rule (And Built in Twists on the Rule) original
    • 4.5.2.1: The Classic Rule of Finality original
    • 4.5.2.1.1: 28 U.S.C. § 1291 - Final decisions of district courts original
    • 4.5.2.1.2: The Final Judgment Rule original
    • 4.5.2.1.3: A Different Approach - New York State Appellate Procedure original
    • 4.5.2.1.4: Review of "No Twists" Final Judgment original
    • 4.5.2.2: Rule 54(b) and Cases Involving Multiple Claims original
    • 4.5.2.2.1: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 (b) original
    • 4.5.2.2.2: Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Mackey original
    • 4.5.2.2.3: Notes on Rule 54(b) original
    • 4.5.2.3: The 'Cohen' or Collateral Order Doctrine original
    • 4.5.2.3.1: Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. original
    • 4.5.2.3.2: Note on Collateral Order Doctrine original
    • 4.5.3: Discretionary Appeals Under 28 USC 1292 (a) and (b) original
    • 4.5.3.1: 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a) and (b) original
    • 4.5.3.2: Appeals Related to Injunctive Relief Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 1292 original
    • 4.5.3.3: Discretionary Appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b) original
    • 4.5.3.4: Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wetzel original
    • 4.5.3.5: Questions On Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wetzel original
    • 4.5.4: Mandamus (AKA Writ of Prohibition) original
    • 4.5.4.1: Overview of Mandamus original
    • 4.5.4.2: Cheney v. United States District Court for District of Columbia original
    • 4.5.4.3: Mandamus Reviewed original
    • 4.5.5: Standard of Review, Timing, and Other Issues original
    • 4.5.5.1: Standard of Review original
    • 4.5.5.2: Bowles v. Russell original
    • 4.5.5.3: Notes On Standard of Review, Timing, and Other Issues original
    • 4.5.6: Review and Recap of Judicial Review original
    • 4.5.6.1: Review of Judicial Review original
    • 4.6: Review - Defining the Objective original
    • 5: Service of Process and Notice original
    • 5.1: Service and Notice Wordcloud original
    • 5.2: Overview of Service of Process and Notice original
    • 5.3: Service of Process original
    • 5.3.1: Statutory Service of Process Overview original
    • 5.3.2: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 3 - Commencing an Action original
    • 5.3.3: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 - Summons original
    • 5.3.4: New York Rule of Civil Procedure 308. Personal service upon a natural person. original
    • 5.3.5: Wyman v. Newhouse original
    • 5.3.6: Service on an Individual original
    • 5.3.7: Insurance Co. of North America v. S/S “Hellenic Challenger” original
    • 5.3.8: Service on an Entity original
    • 5.3.9: Service on Defendants Who Are Outside the United States original
    • 5.3.10: 4.3.1 Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon original
    • 5.3.11: Notes on Service Outside the US original
    • 5.3.12: Service Reviewed original
    • 5.4: The Concept of Constitutional Notice original
    • 5.4.1: Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. original
    • 5.4.2: Notes on Mullane and Constitutional Notice After Mullane original
    • 5.5: Service of Process and Notice Review and Questions original
    • 6: Personal Jurisdiction original
    • 6.1: Personal Jurisdiction Wordcloud original
    • 6.2: Introduction to Personal Jurisdiction original
    • 6.2.1: Introduction original
    • 6.2.2: Comparative View: Hague Convention on Judgments - Acceptable Jurisdictional Assertions original
    • 6.3: The Beginning original
    • 6.3.1: Introduction to Pennoyer original
    • 6.3.2: Pennoyer v. Neff original
    • 6.3.3: Pennoyer Questions original
    • 6.3.4: Direct versus Collateral Attacks on Personal Jurisdiction original
    • 6.3.5: Background to Pennoyer original
    • 6.3.6: In Rem, Quasi-in-Rem, and In Personam Personal Jurisdiction original
    • 6.3.7: States as Sovereigns original
    • 6.4: The Modern Doctrine and the Constitutional Limits of Due Process original
    • 6.4.1: Pennoyer to International Shoe - Transitional Cases As a Country Changes original
    • 6.4.2: International Shoe Co. v. Washington original
    • 6.4.3: International Shoe Questions original
    • 6.4.4: Notes on International Shoe original
    • 6.4.5: General and Specific In Personam Jurisdiction original
    • 6.4.6: Personal Jurisdiction and Rules, Standards, Principles, Catalogs, and Discretion original
    • 6.5: Introduction to Long Arm Statutes: Making Service When The Defendant is Not Within the Territory of the Court original
    • 6.5.1: Introduction to State Long Arm Statutes original
    • 6.5.2: Taishan Gypsum Co. v. Gross original
    • 6.5.3: Rule 4(K) original
    • 6.5.4: Rule 4(k) and Long Arm Discussion original
    • 6.6: The Development of 'General' In Personam Jurisdiction original
    • 6.6.1: General Jurisdiction Before Daimler original
    • 6.6.2: Daimler AG v. Bauman original
    • 6.6.3: Daimler Notes original
    • 6.7: The Development of Specific Personal Jurisdiction original
    • 6.7.1: The Development of Specific Personal Jurisdiction After International Shoe original
    • 6.7.2: McGee v. International Life Ins. Co. original
    • 6.7.3: Hanson v. Denckla original
    • 6.7.4: Notes on McGee and Hanson v. Denckla original
    • 6.7.5: Kulko v. Superior Court original
    • 6.7.6: Special Appearance original
    • 6.7.7: World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson original
    • 6.7.8: Notes on World Wide Volkswagen original
    • 6.7.9: Plaintiff Side Contacts - Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. original
    • 6.7.10: Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984) original
    • 6.7.11: The Effects Test original
    • 6.7.12: 'Contract Plus' - Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 (1985) original
    • 6.7.13: Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal. Solano Cty. original
    • 6.7.14: Notes on Asahi - Reasonableness, Stream of Commerce original
    • 6.7.15: J. McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. Nicastro original
    • 6.7.16: Questions and Notes on Nicastro original
    • 6.7.17: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, 582 U.S. ___, 137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017) original
    • 6.7.18: Notes on Bristol Myers original
    • 6.7.21: Taishan Gypsum Co. v. Gross original
    • 6.7.22: Review of Specific Personal Jurisdiction original
    • 6.8: In Rem and Quasi in Rem Personal Jurisdiction original
    • 6.8.1: Harris v. Balk - Quasi in Rem as a Tool for Asserting Jurisdiction Outside State Borders original
    • 6.8.2: Shaffer v. Heitner original
    • 6.8.3: Notes on Shaffer original
    • 6.8.4: In Rem - What Does Modern In Rem Look Like? original
    • 6.9: Traditional Bases Revisited original
    • 6.9.1: Presence or 'Tag' Jurisdiction original
    • 6.9.1.1: Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal. County of Marin original
    • 6.9.1.2: Notes on Burnham original
    • 6.9.2: Consent and Waiver original
    • 6.9.2.1: Consent by Appearance in Court original
    • 6.9.2.2: State Registration Statutes original
    • 6.9.2.3: Consent by Contract original
    • 6.9.3: Citizenship original
    • 6.10: Wrap Up and Review of Personal Jurisdiction original
    • 6.11: Challenging Personal Jurisdiction original
    • 6.11.1: Problems on Challenging Personal Jurisdiction original
    • 7: Subject Matter Jurisdiction original
    • 7.1: Subject Matter Jurisdiction Wordcloud original
    • 7.2: Introduction to Subject Matter Jurisdiction original
    • 7.2.1: Overview - The Constitutional Basis original
    • 7.2.2: Article III, Section 2 original
    • 7.2.3: Capron v. Van Noorden, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 126 (1804) original
    • 7.2.4: Notes on Capron v. Van Noorden original
    • 7.2.5: Challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction original
    • 7.3: Diversity and Alienage As a Basis For Subject Matter Jurisdiction original
    • 7.3.1: 28 U.S. Code § 1332. Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs original
    • 7.3.2: Determining Domicile original
    • 7.3.2.1: Mas v. Perry original
    • 7.3.2.2: Sheehan v. Gustafson original
    • 7.3.2.3: Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, L.L.C. original
    • 7.3.2.4: Notes on Diversity of the Parties original
    • 7.3.2.5: US Federal Court Cases By Type original
    • 7.3.2.6: Problems and Hypotheticals original
    • 7.3.3: Alienage Jurisdiction original
    • 7.3.3.1: Hebei Tiankai Wood & Land Constr. Ltd. v. Chen, 348 F Supp 3d 198 (EDNY 2018). original
    • 7.3.3.2: Comments on Alienage Jurisdiction original
    • 7.3.3.3: Alienage Problems original
    • 7.3.4: Amount-in-Controversy original
    • 7.3.4.1: JTH Tax, Inc. v. Frashier original
    • 7.3.4.2: Notes on Amount In Controversy original
    • 7.3.4.3: 【Picture】Changes in Amount-in-Controversy original
    • 7.3.4.4: Amount in Controversy Problems original
    • 7.3.5: Diversity and Alienage Jurisdiction Reviewed original
    • 7.3.5.1: Final Notes on Diversity and Alienage Jurisdiction original
    • 7.4: Federal Question Jurisdiction original
    • 7.4.1: Title 28: § 1331 original
    • 7.4.2: Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Mottley original
    • 7.4.3: Notes on L&N R. Co. v. Mottley: The "Face of the Complaint" Rule original
    • 7.4.4: Federal Questions Embedded in a State Statutes original
    • 7.4.5: Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg. original
    • 7.4.6: Note on Embedded Federal Questions original
    • 7.4.7: Federal Question Jurisdiction Problems original
    • 7.5: Supplemental Jurisdiction original
    • 7.5.1: Historical Development of Supplemental Jurisdiction original
    • 7.5.2: 28 U.S. Code § 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction original
    • 7.5.3: § 1367 Explained original
    • 7.5.5: Supplemental Jurisdiction Problems original
    • 7.6: Removal To Federal Court original
    • 7.6.1: General Removal Rule - 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Actions removable generally original
    • 7.6.2: 28 U.S. Code § 1446 - Procedure for removal of civil action original
    • 7.6.3: Background For Removal - Concurrent Jurisdiction of State and Federal Courts original
    • 7.6.4: Spencer v. United States District Court original
    • 7.6.5: Removal Problems original
    • 7.7: Conclusion of Subject Matter Jurisdiction original
    • 7.7.1: 【Picture】Article III & USC § 1331 & USC § 1332 original
    • 7.7.2: 【Picture】Federal Jurisdiction & State Jurisdiction original
    • 7.7.3: Suggested Approaches to Subject Matter Jurisdiction Questions original
    • 7.7.4: Problems on Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction original
    • 8: Venue and Forum non Conveniens original
    • 8.1: Venue and FNC Wordcloud original
    • 8.2: Introduction to Venue original
    • 8.2.1: The General Federal Venue Statute, 28 U.S.C. 1391 original
    • 8.2.2: 【Picture】PJ & SMJ & Venue original
    • 8.2.3: The Concept of Venue original
    • 8.3: How to Transfer Venue original
    • 8.3.1: When the Transferor Court is Proper - 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a) – Change of Venue original
    • 8.3.2: When the Transferor Court is Improper - 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (a), (b) – Cure or Waiver of Defects original
    • 8.3.3: Smith v. Yeager original
    • 8.3.4: Notes on Venue Transfer original
    • 8.4: Forum Non Conveniens original
    • 8.4.2: Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno original
    • 8.4.3: Notes on Forum Non Conveniens original
    • 8.5: Venue Reviewed original
    • 8.6: Practice Questions on Venue original
    • 9: Choice of Law and the Erie Doctrine original
    • 9.1: Choice of Law and Erie Wordcloud original
    • 9.2.1: Horizontal Choice of Law Background original
    • 9.2.3: General Motors Corp. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark original
    • 9.3.1: Background on the Erie Doctrine original
    • 9.3.5: Erie Railroad v. Tompkins original
    • 9.3.6: Erie's Progeny and the Doctrine Today original
    • 10: Pleading original
    • 10.1: Pleading Wordcloud original
    • 10.2: Pleading Generally - The Complaint original
    • 10.2.1: Introduction to Pleading original
    • 10.2.2: The History and Purposes of American Pleading original
    • 10.2.3: First National Bank v. St. Croix Boom Corp. original
    • 10.2.4: Rule 7. Pleadings Allowed; Form of Motions and Other Papers original
    • 10.2.5: Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading original
    • 10.2.6: Conley v. Gibson original
    • 10.2.7: Pleading and Practice After Conley original
    • 10.2.8: Ashcroft v. Iqbal original
    • 10.2.9: Notes on Twombly and Iqbal (aka Twiqbal) original
    • 10.2.10: Rule 9. Pleading Special Matters original
    • 10.2.11: Beyond The Statement of the Claim - Other Pleading Issues original
    • 10.2.12: Swanson v. Citibank, N.A. original
    • 10.2.13: Notes on Swanson original
    • 10.3: Responding to the Complaint original
    • 10.3.1: Rule 12. Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing original
    • 10.3.2: Rule 8(b) and (c) - Defenses original
    • 10.3.3: Responding to a Complaint - Answers, Motions to Dismiss, Etc. original
    • 10.4: Amendment of Pleadings and Relation Back original
    • 10.4.1: Rule 15. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings original
    • 10.4.2: Amending the Complaint, Supplemental Pleadings, and Relation Back original
    • 10.4.3: Beeck v. Aquaslide ‘N’ Dive Corp. original
    • 10.4.4: Krupski v. Costa Crociere original
    • 10.4.5: Notes on Amendments and Relation Back original
    • 10.4.6: Questions on Amendments and Relation Back original
    • 10.5: Ethical Duties and Pleading original
    • 10.5.1: Rule 11. Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions original
    • 10.5.2: Rule 11 and the Duty of Attorneys to Behave Ethically original
    • 10.5.3: Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 38. Frivolous Appeal original
    • 10.5.4: 28 U.S.C. § 1927. Counsel's liability for excessive costs original
    • 10.5.5: Star Mark Management, Inc. v. Koon Chun Hing Kee Soy & Sauce Factory, Ltd. original
    • 10.5.6: Ethical Duties in Litigation Reviewed original
    • 10.6: Pleading Problems original
    • 11: Joinder original
    • 11.1: Joinder Wordcloud original
    • 11.2: Joinder in U.S. Federal Court - The Tools original
    • 11.4.2: M.K. v. Tenet original
    • 11.4.3: Central Tools, Inc. v. Mitutoyo Corp. original
    • 11.5: Joinder Reviewed original
    • 11.6: Joinder Problems original
    • 12: Aggregate Litigation: Class Actions, Multidistrict Litigation, and Other Aggregation Devices original
    • 12.1: Aggregate Litigation Wordcloud original
    • 12.2: Rule 23. Class Actions original
    • 12.3: Rule 23.1. Derivative Actions original
    • 12.4: Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) - 28 U.S.C. 1332 (d) original
    • 12.5: 28 U.S. Code § 1407. Multidistrict litigation original
    • 12.6: Aggregate Litigation Generally original
    • 12.7: Class Settlement Information Website for Taishan Cases original
    • 12.8: Class Certification and Settlement Approval Taishan Claims original
    • 12.9: Class Action Review original
    • 13: Discovery and Case Management original
    • 13.1: Discovery and Case Management Wordcloud original
    • 13.2: Overview of Discovery original
    • 13.2.1: The Rules Relating to Discovery original
    • 13.2.2: Discovery in Comparative Context original
    • 13.2.3: Overview of U.S. Discovery original
    • 13.3: Privileges and Protective Orders original
    • 13.3.1: § 68 Attorney–Client Privilege - Restatement of The Law Governing Lawyers original
    • 13.3.2: Hickman v. Taylor original
    • 13.3.3: Rule 26(b)(3) - The Work Product Doctrine original
    • 13.3.4: Rule 26(b)(5) -  Claiming Privilege or Protecting Trial–Preparation Materials. original
    • 13.3.5: Rule 26(c) - Protective Orders original
    • 13.3.6: Attorney Client Privilege and Work Product Discussed original
    • 13.4: Judicial Supervision and Sanctions original
    • 13.4.1: Rule 37. Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions original
    • 13.4.2: Sanctions and Judicial Supervision original
    • 13.4.3: Global Materials Technologies, Inc., v. Dazheng Metal Fibre Co. Ltd. et al original
    • 13.4.4: Sanctions Overview original
    • 13.5: Discovery Review original
    • 13.6: Discovery Questions and Problems original
    • 14: Judgments and Adjudication Without Trial original
    • 14.1: Judgments Wordcloud original
    • 14.2: Introduction to Disposition Without Trial original
    • 14.3: Dismissals original
    • 14.3.1: Rule 41 – Dismissal of Actions original
    • 14.3.2: Dismissals, Voluntary and Otherwise original
    • 14.4: Defaults and Default Judgments original
    • 14.4.1: Rule 55 – Default; Default Judgment original
    • 14.4.2: Rule 60— Relief From Judgment or Order original
    • 14.4.3: Defaults and Default Judgments original
    • 14.4.4: Germano v. Taishan Gypsum Co. original
    • 14.4.5: Notes on Default original
    • 14.5: Summary Judgment original
    • 14.5.1: Rule 56 – Summary Judgment original
    • 14.5.2: Summary Judgment Introduction original
    • 14.5.3: Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co. original
    • 14.5.4: Notes on Adickes original
    • 14.5.5: Celotex Corp. v. Catrett original
    • 14.5.6: Antitrust Trilogy and Beyond original
    • 14.6: Judgment and Adjudication Without Trial Reviewed original
    • 14.7: Practice Questions on Disposition Without Trial original
    • 15: Trial, The Right to a Jury Trial, and Posttrial Motions original
    • 15.1: Trial Wordcloud original
    • 15.2: The American Trial in Context original
    • 15.3: Right to a Jury Trial original
    • 15.3.1: Seventh Amendment to the Constitution original
    • 15.3.2: Rule 38. Right to a Jury Trial; Demand original
    • 15.3.3: Rule 39. Trial by Jury or by the Court original
    • 15.3.4: Introduction to Trials original
    • 15.3.5: Excerpt from Michigan Model Civil Jury Instructions original
    • 15.3.6: Constitutional Right to a Jury original
    • 15.4: Challenges to a Jury Verdict original
    • 15.4.1: Rule 50. Judgment as a Matter of Law in a Jury Trial; Related Motion for a New Trial; Conditional Ruling original
    • 15.4.2: Rule 59. New Trial; Altering or Amending a Judgment original
    • 15.4.3: Post Trial Motions original
    • 15.4.4: Denman v. Spain original
    • 15.5: Trial Summary original
    • 15.6: Questions Related to Trial original
    • 16: Claim and Issue Preclusion - Res Judicata original
    • 16.1: Preclusion Wordcloud original
    • 16.2: Introduction and Terminology original
    • 16.3: Claim Preclusion original
    • 16.3.1: Claim Preclusion Generally original
    • 16.3.2: Reeder v. Succession of Palmer original
    • 16.3.3: Jones v. Morris Plan Bank original
    • 16.3.4: Claim Preclusion Reviewed original
    • 16.4: Issue Preclusion original
    • 16.4.1: Issue Preclusion Generally original
    • 16.4.2: Rios v. Davis original
    • 16.4.3: Bernhard v. Bank of America original
    • 16.4.4: Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore original
    • 16.4.5: Issue Preclusion Reviewed original
    • 16.5: Quality and Nature of Judgment original
    • 16.5.1: Preclusion Across Different Court Systems Within the US original
    • 16.5.2: Non-Court Proceedings - Administrative Decisions and Arbitrations original
    • 16.5.3: Preclusive Effect of Judgments from Outside The United States original
    • 16.5.3.1: Introduction to Preclusive Effect of Foreign Judgments original
    • 16.5.3.2: Illinois 5/12-667. Effect of recognition of foreign-country judgment original
    • 16.5.3.3: Global Materials Technologies, Inc., v. Dazheng Metal Fibre Co. Ltd. et al (Claim Preclusion Discussion) original
    • 16.5.3.4: Discussion of Claim Preclusion Effect of Non-U.S. Judgments original
    • 16.6: Assertion of Preclusion original
    • 16.7: Preclusion Reviewed original
    • 16.8: Preclusion Questions original

This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use. Material included from the American Legal Institute is reproduced with permission and is exempted from the open license.