CEIPI Advanced Training on Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property (4th Edition, 2021) (Syllabus)

Giancarlo Frosio (University of Turin, Nexa Center, Center for International Intellectual Property Studies, Stanford CIS)

This syllabus includes materials specifically designed for the CEIPI Advance Training Program on Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property. It is a resource aiming at blending together international, European and US legislation, case law, and doctrinal pieces. It is intended to be a resource that might serve as a reference for further in depth review of the topics touched upon during the training program. This syllabus is a work in progress and will be updated in due course.

4 Module 3 - AI and Copyright: Authorship 4 Module 3 - AI and Copyright: Authorship

4.1. Naruto v. Slater, No. 16-15469 (9th Cir. 2018)

Naruto v. Slater, No. 16-15469 (9th Cir. 2018)

4.2. Giancarlo Frosio, Copyright – Is the Machine an Author?, in ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE AUDIOVISUAL SECTOR 87-115 (European Audiovisual Observatory, IRIS Special 2020-2, 2021)

Giancarlo Frosio, Copyright – Is the Machine an Author?, in ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE AUDIOVISUAL SECTOR 87-115 (European Audiovisual Observatory, IRIS Special 2020-2, 2021)

4.3. Jane Ginsburg, People Not Machines: Authorship and What It Means in the Berne Convention, 49 IIC 131 (2018)

Jane Ginsburg, People Not Machines: Authorship and What It Means in the Berne Convention, 49 IIC 131 (2018)

4.4. Russ Pearlman, Recognizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) as Authors and Inventors Under U.S. Intellectual Property Law, 24(2) Rich. J. L. & Tech. 1 (2018)

Russ Pearlman, Recognizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) as Authors and Inventors Under U.S. Intellectual Property Law, 24(2) Rich. J. L. & Tech. 1 (2018)

4.5. Ana Ramalho, Will Robots Rule the (Artistic) World? A Proposed Model for the Legal Status of Creations by Artificial Intelligence Systems, 21 Journal of Internet Law 1 (2017)

Ana Ramalho, Will Robots Rule the (Artistic) World? A Proposed Model for the Legal Status of Creations by Artificial Intelligence Systems, 21 Journal of Internet Law 1 (2017)

4.6. James Grimmelmann, There is No Such Thing as a Computer-Authored Work And It is a Good Thing, Too, 39 Colum. J. L. & Arts. 403 (2016)

James Grimmelmann, There is No Such Thing as a Computer-Authored Work And It is a Good Thing, Too, 39 Colum. J. L. & Arts. 403 (2016)

4.7. James Grimmelmann, Copyright for Literate Robots, 101 Iowa Law Review 657 (2016)

James Grimmelmann, Copyright for Literate Robots, 101 Iowa Law Review 657 (2016)

4.8. Bruce Boyden, Emergent Works, 39 Colum. J.L. & Arts 377 (2016)

Bruce Boyden, Emergent Works, 39 Colum. J.L. & Arts 377 (2016)

4.9. Annemarie Bridy, Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author, 2012 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 5 (2012)

Annemarie Bridy, Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author, 2012 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 5 (2012)

4.10. Jani McCutcheon, Vanishing Author in Computer-Generated Works: A Critical Analysis of Recent Australian Case Law, 36 Melbourne University Law Review 915 (2012)

Jani McCutcheon, Vanishing Author in Computer-Generated Works: A Critical Analysis of Recent Australian Case Law, 36 Melbourne University Law Review 915 (2012)

4.11. Alan Durham, Copyright and Information Theory: Toward an Alternative Model of "Authorship", 2004 BYU L. Rev. 69 (2004)

Alan Durham, Copyright and Information Theory: Toward an Alternative Model of "Authorship", 2004 BYU L. Rev. 69 (2004)

4.12. Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Causing Copyright, 117 Colum. L. Rev. 1 (2017)