MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. MOTOROLA, INC.; Motorola Mobility, Inc.; General Instrument Corporation, Defendants–Appellants.

795 F.3d 1024

This case (a) demonstrates how the “another purpose” exception to Rule 408 operates and (b) illustrates the interactions between Rule 408 and 403, and Rule 408 and limiting instructions.

This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.