Property Law CUNY Fall 2022

Resource 8 . 3

27 minutes

Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council

Rebecca Bratspies

Notice how different the issue is from Detweiler. In Detweiler, the proposed use was permitted.  The owner was requesting a variance from the set back requirements, not to add a forbidden use of the property.  

Supreme Court of the United States

505 U.S. 1003, 120 L. Ed. 2d 798, 112 S. Ct. 2886, SCDB 1991-118, 1992 U.S. LEXIS 4537

No. 91-453

1992-06-29

This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.