Main Content

Walsh's ConLaw I 2021

Barron v. Baltimore (1833)

Unlike almost every other opinion that we will read this semester, I am providing you with an unedited version of Barron v. Baltimore (1833). The edits that you see all relate to extra material added by the case reporter to describe the arguments of the parties. Chief Justice Marshall's opinion starts at the place where his name is in CAPS as  having delivered the opinion of the Court. As you read through it, keep the Constitution close by so that you can refer to the various sections under discussion. Without that simultaneous reference (and barring the ability to summon constitutional provisions from unaided memory), you will not be able to understand some of the arguments that Chief Justice Marshall is making.

This case has a corresponding movie segment and overview by Barnett & Blackman (BB5). I recommend reading the whole opinion first before you watch the movie/read the summary.