Change history
-
December 12th, 2025
-
February 11th, 2025
-
January 6th, 2025
-
February 1st, 2024
-
Removed UTV v 1337x.to (Delhi HC, 2019) from CopyrightX - NLSIU (2024)
-
Removed Gramophone Company of India Ltd. v. Birendra Bahadur Pande from CopyrightX - NLSIU (2024)
-
Removed Indian Performing Right Society v. Badal Dhar Chowdhry from CopyrightX - NLSIU (2024)
-
Removed Sheo Ratan Upadhya v. Gopal Chandra Nepali from CopyrightX - NLSIU (2024)
-
Edited Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (SCOTUS 2023)
-
Edited IPRS v. Rajasthan Patrika (P) Ltd. (Bombay HC, 2023)
-
Removed Agarwala Publishing House, Khurja v. Board of High School and Intermediate Education U. P. Allahabad from CopyrightX - NLSIU (2024)
-
Removed Turner Entertainment Co. v. Huston, Court of Appeal of Versailles, France, December 19, 1994 from CopyrightX - NLSIU (2024)
-
Removed William W. Fisher, Recalibrating Originality from CopyrightX - NLSIU (2024)
-
Removed Burlington Home Shopping Pvt. Ltd v. Rajnish Chibber from CopyrightX - NLSIU (2024)
-
Removed History of US Copyright Law from CopyrightX - NLSIU (2024)
-
Added Universal City Studios LLC. and Ors. v. DotMovies.Baby and Ors. (Delhi HC, 2023)
-
Added St Art India Foundation & Anr. v. Acko General Insurance (Delhi HC, 2023)
-
Added R.D. Bansal and Co. v. Harpercollins Publishers India (Delhi HC, 2023)
-
Added Second Request for Reconsideration for Refusal to Register SURYAST (Copyright Review Board, December 11, 2023)
-
Added Generative AI Exists Because of the Transformer (Financial Times, September 12, 2023)
-
February 7th, 2023
-
January 30th, 2022
-
Removed Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum from CopyrightX - NLUD (2022)
-
Removed Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. v. Jung from CopyrightX - NLUD (2022)
-
Removed Dastar Corporation v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. from CopyrightX - NLUD (2022)
-
Removed Martin v. City of Indianapolis from CopyrightX - NLUD (2022)
-
Removed Moral Rights from CopyrightX - NLUD (2022)
-
Removed Swirsky v. Carey from CopyrightX - NLUD (2022)
-
Removed Boisson v. Banian, Ltd. from CopyrightX - NLUD (2022)
-
Removed F.M. Scherer, "The Innovation Lottery," in Rochelle Dreyfuss et al., eds., Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property (Oxford Univ. Press 2001), pp. 3-21 from CopyrightX - NLUD (2022)
-
Removed Justin Hughes, "The Philosophy of Intellectual Property," 77 Georgetown L.J. 287, Part II (pages 296-314) (1988) from CopyrightX - NLUD (2022)
-
Added Rentmeester v. Nike, Inc. (9th Cir. 2018)
-
Added Turner Entertainment Co. v. Huston, Court of Appeal of Versailles, France, December 19, 1994
-
Added Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974), pp. 174-182
-
Added John Locke, The Second Treatise of Government (1689), Chapter 5
-
January 22nd, 2022
-
Removed Blanch v. Koons from CopyrightX - NLUD (2021)
-
Removed Gaylord v. United States from CopyrightX - NLUD (2021)
-
Removed William Fisher, Promises to Keep (2004), Chapter 6 from CopyrightX - NLUD (2021)
-
Removed Alternatives to Copyright from CopyrightX - NLUD (2021)
-
Removed Oracle America, Inc. v. Google, Inc. from CopyrightX - NLUD (2021)
-
Removed Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc. from CopyrightX - NLUD (2021)
-
Removed Software from CopyrightX - NLUD (2021)
-
Removed Pivot Point, Int'l v. Charlene Products from CopyrightX - NLUD (2021)
-
Added 37 C.F.R 201.40 (2021)
-
Added Castillo v. G&M Realty (2d Cir. 2020)
-
Added Sophie Grais, “The Story of 5Pointz” (2021)
-
Added Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (2d Cir. 2021)
-
Added Google v. Oracle (SCOTUS 2021), paragraphs 50-106, 126-163
-
Added Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc., 49 F.3d 807 (1st Cir. 1995)
-
Added Google v. Oracle (SCOTUS 2021), paragraphs 1-49, 107-125
-
Added Jolls, Sunstein, and Thaler, A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics, pp. 1471-1489
-
Added A $550 Million Springsteen Deal? It’s Glory Days for Catalog Sales. - The New York Times
-
Added The Music Modernization Act | U.S. Copyright Office
-
January 21st, 2015
-
Casebook first published.
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed
for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts.
Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.