Main Content
People V Donald Analysis
People v. Donald (1981) Case Study
Concise Overview
People v. Donald addresses critical Fourth Amendment questions regarding police observations through apartment windows, warrantless entries based on exigent circumstances, and the legal standards for suppression hearings. The Colorado Supreme Court reversed a trial court's suppression ruling, holding that observations made from common entrances or passageways do not constitute searches, and remanded for a proper evidentiary hearing on whether exigent circumstances justified the warrantless entry.
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.