Main Content
People V. Gomez Analysis
People v. Gomez (1981) Case Study
Concise Overview
People v. Gomez addresses critical Fourth Amendment questions regarding visual observations through motel curtains, warrantless entry based on exigent circumstances, and seizure of evidence in plain view. The Colorado Supreme Court held that an officer's observation through a gap in motel curtains from a public walkway did not constitute a search, and that exigent circumstances justified the subsequent warrantless entry when the officer observed drug activity and the suspect was likely to destroy evidence.
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.