Main Content

AI and Law: Unleashing and Restraining AI

Consumer Protection - Privacy

Guiding Questions

  • How do different jurisdictions' approaches to AI regulation (EU, California, Colorado, Utah, Washington) reflect varying priorities in protecting consumer privacy? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this regulatory fragmentation?
  • What role should transparency and disclosure requirements play in AI regulation? Are they sufficient to protect consumer privacy?
  • How effectively do existing privacy frameworks (like GDPR and CCPA) address the unique challenges posed by modern AI systems? What gaps remain?

 

Guest 

Hayley Tsukayama

 

Required 

 

Facts

 

Law

 

Application

  • CCPA
    • People v. Sephora USA, Inc., No. [case number pending] (Cal. Super. Ct. filed Aug. 23, 2022) (Sephora Complaint). [read paragraphs 1-3, 10-13, 14-16, otherwise skim].
    • People v. DoorDash, Inc., No. [case number pending] (Cal. Super. Ct. filed Feb. 21, 2024) (DoorDash Complaint) [read paragraphs 4-6, 7-12, 13-14, otherwise skim].
  • GDPR
    • Case C-131/12, Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja González, ECLI:EU:C:2014:317 (2014) (Google Spain).

 

Optional