Main Content
McGee v. International Life Insurance
Daimler was about general personal jurisdiction. Most of the remainder of our cases will be about specific personal jurisdiction. The first is McGee.
The McGee opinion is short, and the case was 9-0 in favor of the plaintiff's assertion of personal jurisdiction. In other words, the Supreme Court thought this was an easy fact pattern to decide after International Shoe. In isolation, it might seem so. The harder question might be what distinguishes McGee from the next case you will read, Hanson v. Denckla, in which a 5-4 majority went the other way.
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.