Content from the following sources has been used in the creation of this casebook:

• Untitled

  (First created Jun 2023)

  Authors:

  • Kim D. Ricardo

  
  

  Including material from the following sections:

  • 1: Week 1
  • 2: Week 2
  • 3: Week 3
  • 4: Week 4
  • 5: Week 5
  • 6: Week 6
  • 7: Week 7
  • 8: Week 8
  • 9: Week 9
  • 10: Week 10
  • 11: Week 11
  • 12: Week 12
  • 13: Week 13: Catch-up and review
• Criminal Procedure: Investigation

  (First published Aug 2023)

  Authors:

  • Kim D. Ricardo

  
  

  Including material from the following sections:

  • 1.1: What the U.S. Constitution Says about the Regulation of Police
  • 1.3: PART 1: What Constitutes a Search?
  • 2.1: PART 2: Do the Police Need a Search Warrant?
  • 2.2: PART 3: What Does a Search Warrant Look Like?
  • 2.3: PART 4: The Many Exceptions to the Search Warrant Requirement
  • 3.1: PART 4 (Cont.): The Many Exceptions to the Search Warrant Requirement
  • 4.1: DO THE POLICE NEED AN ARREST WARRANT?
  • 4.2: PART 1: WHAT CONSTITUTES A SEIZURE?
  • 5.1.5: Commonwealth v. Warren (Mass. 2016)
  • 6.1: Small group assignments
  • 6.2: Discussion Board post
  • 7.2.1: Civil suits and the qualified immunity rule
  • 12.1: Lineups and identifications
  • 12.2: United States v. Wade
  • 12.3: Kirby v. Illinois
  • 12.4: United States v. Ash
  • 12.5: Stovall v. Denno
  • 12.6: Manson v. Brathwaite
• Criminal Procedure Fall 2021

  (First published Sep 2022)

  Authors:

  • C.E. Field

  
  

  Including material from the following sections:

  • 1.2.2: United States v. White (1971)
  • 1.2.3: Smith v. Maryland (1979)
  • 1.3.1.1: Katz v. United States (1967)
  • 1.3.1.2: California v. Greenwood (1988)
  • 1.3.1.3: Florida v. Riley (1989)
  • 1.3.1.4: Florida v. Jardines (2013)
  • 1.3.1.5: Kyllo v. United States (2001)
  • 1.3.1.6: United States v. Jones (2012)
  • 2.1.2.1: What does “probable cause” mean?
  • 2.1.2.3: Illinois v. Gates (1983)
  • 2.3.2.1: Colorado v. Bertine (1986)
  • 2.3.2.2: City of Indianapolis v. Edmond (2000)
  • 3.1.1.8: Atwater v. City of Lago Vista (2001)
  • 3.1.2.2: California v. Acevedo (1991)
  • 5.1.1: Terry v. Ohio (1968)
  • 5.1.3: Illinois v. Wardlow (2000)
  • 5.2.2: Maryland v. Pringle (2003)
  • 7.2: Part 5: Remedies for government violations of the warrant requirement
  • 8.2.2.4: Brewer v. Williams (1977)
  • 9.1: What is the Miranda rule and when does it apply?
  • 9.2.1: Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
  • 9.3.2.1: Rhode Island v. Innis (1980)
  • 10.1.1: Michigan v. Mosley (1975)
  • 10.1.5: Maryland v. Shatzer (2009)
  • 10.1.6: Part 4: Waiver of Miranda rights
  • 10.1.7: Part 5: More on Miranda and the 5th Amendment's Privilege
  • 11.1.1: Oregon v. Elstad (1985)
  • 11.1.2: Missouri v. Seibert (2004)
  • 11.2.1: Patterson v. Illinois (1988)
  • 11.2.3: Montejo v. Louisiana (2009)

  
  

  Criminal Procedure Fall 2021 incorporates additional material from:

  • Criminal Procedure: Investigation (first published Aug 2022) with contributions from:
    • Kim D. Ricardo
• Criminal Procedure: Investigation

  (First published Aug 2022)

  Authors:

  • Kim D. Ricardo

  
  

  Including material from the following sections:

  • 1.3.1.7: Carpenter v. United States (2018)
  • 2.1.2.2: Spinelli v. United States (1969)
  • 2.2.1: Maryland v. Garrison (1987)
  • 2.2.2: Richards v. Wisconsin (1997)
  • 2.2.3: Search warrant issued in case that led to the killing of Breonna Taylor
  • 2.3.1.1: Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973)
  • 2.3.1.2: Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990)
  • 2.3.1.3: Georgia v. Randolph (2006)
  • 2.3.2.3: Safford Unified School District #1 v. Redding (2009)
  • 3.1.1.1: Chimel v. California (1969)
  • 3.1.1.2: Vale v. Louisiana (1970)
  • 3.1.1.3: United States v. Robinson (1973)
  • 3.1.1.4: New York v. Belton (1981)
  • 3.1.1.5: Arizona v. Gant (2009)
  • 3.1.1.9: Riley v. California (2014)
  • 3.1.2.1: California v. Carney (1985)
  • 3.1.2.3: Wyoming v. Houghton (1999)
  • 3.1.2.4: Collins v. Virginia (2018)
  • 4.2.1: Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Delgado (1984)
  • 4.2.2: Florida v. Bostick (1991)
  • 4.2.3: Florida v. Royer (1983)
  • 4.2.5: Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
  • 4.2.6: Racial profiling
  • 5.1: Part 2: When a stop is not a seizure: the Terry doctrine
  • 5.2: Part 3: Arrests
  • 7.1: Part 4: Exceptions to the warrant requirement
  • 7.2.1.1: Jamison v. McClendon (S.D. Miss. 2020)
  • 7.2.2: The Exclusionary Rule
  • 8.1: When does the right to counsel apply?
  • 8.2: Interrogations
  • 9.2: Part 1: The Miranda rule
  • 9.3: Part 2: Key terms
  • 10.1: Part 3: Can police try again after a suspect invokes her Miranda rights?
  • 11.1: Part 5: More on Miranda and the 5th Amendment's Privilege (cont.)
  • 11.2: Part 6: Miranda and Messiah