Main Content

Casebook Credits History

Content from the following sources has been used in the creation of this casebook:

    • 1: Introduction: Contract as a Principle of Order original
    • 1.1: Introduction: Contract as a Principle of Order original
    • 2: Chapter 1: From Status to Contract and Beyond original
    • 2.1: Maine, Ancient Law original
    • 2.2: Adam Smith, Lectures on Justice, Policy, Revenue and Arms original
    • 2.3: Background original
    • 2.3.1: A. Background original
    • 2.4: The Emancipation and Evolution of the Substantive Law of Contract original
    • 2.4.1: B. The Emancipation and Evolution of the Substantive Law of Contract original
    • 2.5: Codifications and Restatements original
    • 2.5.1: C. Codifications and Restatements original
    • 3: Chapter 2: The Basic Ideals of an Individualistic Law of Contracts and Their Erosion original
    • 3.1: Chapter 2: The Basic Ideals of an Individualistic Law of Contracts and Their Erosion Introduction original
    • 3.2: Hurley v. Eddingfield original
    • 3.3: Notes - Hurley v. Eddingfield original
    • 3.4: Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Cream of Wheat Co. original
    • 3.5: United States v. Colgate Co. original
    • 3.6: Notes - United States v. Colgate Co. original
    • 3.7: Poughkeepsie Buying Service, Inc., v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers, Inc. original
    • 3.8: Notes - Poughkeepsie Buying Service, Inc. v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers, Inc. original
    • 3.9: Continental Forest Products, Inc. v. Chandler Supply Co. original
    • 3.10: Notes - Continental Forest Products v. Chandler Supply Co. original
    • 3.11: Watteau v. Fenwick original
    • 3.12: Notes - Watteau v. Fenwick original
    • 3.13: Noble v. Williams original
    • 3.14: Notes - Noble v. Williams original
    • 3.15: Davis & Co v. Morgan original
    • 3.16: Notes - Davis & Co. v. Morgan original
    • 3.17: Schwartzreich v. Bauman-Basch original
    • 3.18: Notes - Schwartzreich v. Bauman-Basch, Inc. original
    • 3.19: Wood v. Boynton original
    • 3.20: Notes - Wood v. Boynton original
    • 3.21: Sherwood v. Walker original
    • 3.22: Notes - Sherwood v. Walker original
    • 3.23: Laidlaw v. Organ original
    • 3.24: Notes - Laidlaw v. Organ original
    • 3.25: Swinton v. Whitinsville Savings Bank original
    • 3.26: Notes - Swinton v. Whitinsville Savings Bank original
    • 3.27: Blair v. National Security Insurance Co. original
    • 3.28: Notes - Blair v. National Security Insurance Co. original
    • 3.29: Sternaman v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. original
    • 3.30: Notes - Sternaman v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. original
    • 3.31: School Trustees of Trenton v. Bennett original
    • 3.32: Notes - School Trustees of Trenton v. Bennett original
    • 3.33: O. W. Holmes, The Common Law original
    • 3.34: Notes - O. W. Holmes, The Common Law original
    • 3.35: Hadley v. Baxendale original
    • 3.36: Notes - Hadley v. Baxendale original
    • 4: Chapter 3: The Bargain original
    • 4.1: The Contract as a Promissory Transaction original
    • 4.1.1: The Contract as a Promissory Transaction Introduction original
    • 4.1.2: Restatement of Contracts Second original
    • 4.1.3: Notes - Restatement of Contracts Second §1 original
    • 4.1.4: Restatement of Contracts Second §2 original
    • 4.1.5: Notes - Restatement of Contracts Second §2 original
    • 4.1.6: Restatement of Contracts Second §§3, 17, 18, 22, 23, 24 original
    • 4.1.7: Uniform Commercial Code §1-201 original
    • 4.1.8: Balfour v. Balfour original
    • 4.1.9: Notes - Balfour v. Balfour original
    • 4.1.10: Davis v. General Mills Food Corp. original
    • 4.1.11: Notes - Davis v. General Foods Corp. original
    • 4.1.12: The Mabley & Carew Co. v. Borden original
    • 4.1.13: Notes - The Mabley & Carew Co. v. Borden original
    • 4.1.14: Armstrong v. M'Ghee original
    • 4.1.15: Notes - Armstrong v. M’Ghee original
    • 4.1.16: Anderson v. Backlund original
    • 4.1.17: Notes - Anderson v. Backlund original
    • 4.1.18: Sullivan v. O'Connor original
    • 4.1.19: Notes - Sullivan v. O’Connor original
    • 4.1.20: Shaheen v. Knight original
    • 4.1.21: Notes - Shaheen v. Knight original
    • 4.2: The Tripartite Distinction of Contracts – The Implied Contract original
    • 4.2.1: The Tripartite Distinction of Contracts – The Implied Contract Introduction original
    • 4.2.2: Young and Ashburnham's Case original
    • 4.2.3: Notes - Young and Ashburnham’s Case original
    • 4.2.4: Hertzog v. Hertzog original
    • 4.2.5: Notes - Hertzog v. Hertzog original
    • 4.2.6: Barnet's Estate original
    • 4.2.7: Cropsey v. Sweeney original
    • 4.2.8: Shaw v. Shaw original
    • 4.2.9: Notes - Shaw v. Shaw original
    • 4.2.10: Hewitt v. Hewitt original
    • 4.2.11: Notes - Hewitt v. Hewitt original
    • 4.2.12: Cotnam v. Wisdom original
    • 4.2.13: Notes - Cotnam v. Wisdom original
    • 4.2.14: Sommers v. Putnam Board of Education original
    • 4.2.15: Notes - Sommers v. Putnam Board of Education original
    • 4.2.16: Upton-on-Severn Rural District Council v. Powell original
    • 4.2.17: Notes - Upton-on-Severn rural District Council v. Powell original
    • 4.2.18: Vickery v. Ritchie original
    • 4.2.19: Notes - Vickery v. Ritchie original
    • 4.2.20: Michigan Central R.R. v. State original
    • 4.2.21: Martin v. Companaro original
    • 4.2.22: Notes - Martin v. Companaro original
    • 4.3: Indefinite Contracts original
    • 4.3.1: Indefinite Contracts Introduction original
    • 4.3.2: Young and Ashburnham's Case original
    • 4.3.3: Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc. original
    • 4.3.4: Notes - Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc. original
    • 4.3.5: Jenkins Towel Service, Inc. v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. original
    • 4.3.6: Notes - Jenkins Towel Service, Inc. v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. original
    • 4.3.7: Moulton vs. Kershaw original
    • 4.3.8: Fairmount Glass Works v. Grunden-Martin Woodenware Co. original
    • 4.3.9: Notes - Fairmont Glass Works v. Crunden-Martin Woodenware Co. original
    • 4.3.10: Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminum Ltd. Sales original
    • 4.3.11: Notes - Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminum Ltd. Sales original
    • 4.4: The Duty to Bargain in Good Faith original
    • 4.4.1: The Duty to Bargain in Good Faith Introduction original
    • 4.4.2: Hill v. Waxberg original
    • 4.4.3: Notes - Hill v. Waxberg original
    • 4.4.4: Heyer Products v. United States original
    • 4.4.5: Notes - Heyer Products v. United States original
    • 4.4.6: Goodman v. Dicker original
    • 4.4.7: Notes - Goodman v. Dicker original
    • 4.4.8: Chrysler Corp. v. Quimby original
    • 4.4.9: Notes - Chrysler Corp. v. Quimby original
    • 4.4.10: Collins Radio Co. original
    • 4.4.11: Notes - Collins Radio Co. original
    • 4.4.12: Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Remington Paper & Power Co. Inc. original
    • 4.4.13: Notes - The Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. V. Remington Paper and Power Co., Inc. original
    • 4.4.14: Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores original
    • 4.4.15: Notes - Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores original
    • 4.4.16: Wheeler v. White original
    • 4.4.17: Borg-Warner Corp. v. Anchor Coupling Co. original
    • 4.4.18: Notes - Borg-Warner Corp. v. Anchor Coupling Co. original
    • 4.4.19: Itek Corp. v. Chicago Aerial Industries, Inc. original
    • 4.4.20: Notes - Itek Corp. v. Chicago Aerial Industries, Inc. original
    • 4.5: The Assent and Some of Its Mysteries original
    • 4.5.1: The Assent and Some of Its Mysteries Introduction original
    • 4.5.2: Prescott v. Jones original
    • 4.5.3: Notes - Prescott v. Jones original
    • 4.5.4: National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Joseph Ehrlich original
    • 4.5.5: Austin v. Burge original
    • 4.5.6: Notes - Austin v. Burge original
    • 4.5.7: Cole-McIntyre-Norfleet Co. v. Holloway original
    • 4.5.8: Notes - Cole-McIntyre-Norfleet Co. v. Holloway original
    • 4.5.9: Langellier v. Schaefer original
    • 4.5.10: Notes - Langellier v. Schaefer original
    • 4.5.11: Butler v. Foley original
    • 4.5.12: Notes - Butler v. Foley original
    • 4.5.13: United States v. Braunstein original
    • 4.5.14: Notes - United States v. Braunstein original
    • 4.6: Standard Form Contracts — The Battle of the Forms and Contracts of Adhesion original
    • 4.6.1: Kessler, Contracts of Adhesion – Some Thoughts about Freedom of Contract, 43 Colum. L. Rev. 629, 631-632 (1943) original
    • 4.6.2: The Battle of the Forms original
    • 4.6.2.1: Subsection: The Battle of the Forms Introduction original
    • 4.6.2.2: Roto-Lith, Ltd. v. F.P. Bartlett & Co. original
    • 4.6.2.3: Notes - Roth-Lith, Ltd. v. F. P. Bartlett & Co. original
    • 4.6.2.4: Air Products & Chem., Inc. v. Fairbanks Morse, Inc. original
    • 4.6.2.5: Notes - Air Products & Chem., Inc. v. Fairbanks Morse, Inc. original
    • 4.6.3: Contracts of Adhesion original
    • 4.6.3.1: Subsection: Contracts of Adhesion Introduction original
    • 4.6.3.2: Woodburn v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. original
    • 4.6.3.3: Notes- Woodburn v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. original
    • 4.7: The Bargain Theory of Contracts and the Reliance Principle original
    • 4.7.1: The Bargain Theory of Contracts and the Reliance Principle Introduction original
    • 4.7.2: Siegel v. Spear & Co. original
    • 4.7.3: Notes - Siegel v. Spear & Co. original
    • 4.7.4: Lusk-Harbison-Jones, Inc. v. Universal Credit Co. original
    • 4.7.5: Fisher v. Jackson original
    • 4.7.6: Notes - Fisher v. Jackson original
    • 4.7.7: Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Century Realty Co. original
    • 4.7.8: Notes - Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Century Realty Co. original
    • 4.7.9: Capitol Savings and Loan Association v. Przybylowicz original
    • 4.7.10: Notes - Capital Savings & Loan Assn. v. Przybylowicz original
    • 4.7.11: Chapman v. Bomann original
    • 4.7.12: Notes - Chapman v. Bomann original
    • 4.7.13: Feinberg v. Pfeiffer Co. original
    • 4.7.14: Notes - Feinberg v. Pfeiffer Co. original
    • 4.8: Firm Offers and the Bargain Principle original
    • 4.8.1: Firm Offers and the Bargain Principle Introduction original
    • 4.8.2: Dickinson v. Dodds original
    • 4.8.3: Notes - Dickinson v. Dodds original
    • 4.8.4: Jordan v. Dobbins original
    • 4.8.5: Notes - Jordan v. Dobbins original
    • 4.8.6: James Baird Co. v. Gimbel Bros. original
    • 4.8.7: Notes - James Baird Co. v. Gimbel Bros. original
    • 4.8.8: Drennan v. Star Paving Co. original
    • 4.8.9: Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co. original
    • 4.8.10: Southern California Acoustics Co. v. C. V. Holder, Inc. original
    • 4.8.11: Notes - Southern California Acoustics v. C. V. Holder, In original
    • 4.8.12: Elsinore Union Elementary School Dist. of Riverside County v. Kastorff original
    • 4.9: Consideration and the Contract by Correspondence original
    • 4.9.1: Consideration and the Contract by Correspondence Introduction original
    • 4.9.2: Cushing v. Thomson original
    • 4.9.3: Cushing v. Thomson original
    • 4.9.4: Notes - Cushing v. Thomson original
    • 4.9.5: Lewis v. Browning original
    • 4.9.6: Rhode Island Tool Co. v. United States original
    • 4.9.7: Notes - Lewis v. Browning original
    • 4.9.8: Notes - Rhode Island Tool Co. v. United States original
    • 4.9.9: Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. BBTC Company original
    • 4.9.10: Notes - Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. BBTC Company original
    • 4.9.11: C. Langdell, Summary of the Law of Contracts 20-21 (2d ed. 1880) original
    • 4.9.12: Llewellyn, Our Case-Law of Contract: Offer and Acceptance original
    • 4.9.13: Postal Telegraph-Cable Company v. Floyd Willis original
    • 4.9.14: Notes - Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Willis original
    • 4.9.15: Caldwell v. Cline original
    • 4.9.16: Notes - Caldwell v. Cline original
    • 4.10: Unilateral vs. Bilateral Contracts – Manufactured Difficulties original
    • 4.10.1: Unilateral vs. Bilateral Contracts – Manufactured Difficulties Introduction original
    • 4.10.2: Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. original
    • 4.10.3: Taft v. Hyatt original
    • 4.10.4: Notes - Taft v. Hyatt original
    • 4.10.5: Strong v. Sheffield original
    • 4.10.6: Notes - Strong v. Sheffield original
    • 4.10.7: Hay v. Fortier original
    • 4.10.8: Notes - Hay v. Fortier original
    • 4.10.9: Davis v. Jacoby original
    • 4.10.10: Notes - Davis v. Jacoby original
    • 4.10.11: Crook v. Cowan original
    • 4.10.12: Note - Crook v. Cowan original
    • 4.10.13: Bishop v. Eaton original
    • 4.10.14: Note - Bishop v. Eaton original
    • 4.10.15: White v. Corlies original
    • 4.10.16: Notes - White v. Corlies original
    • 4.10.17: Los Angeles Traction Co. v. Wilshire original
    • 4.10.18: Notes - Los Angeles Traction Co. v. Wilshire original
    • 4.10.19: Petterson v. Pattberg original
    • 4.10.20: Whittier, The Restatement of Contracts and Mutual Assent original
    • 4.10.21: Baumgartner v. Meek original
    • 4.10.22: Note on Real Estate Brokerage Agreements original
    • 4.10.23: Notes - Baumgartner v. Meek original
    • 4.11: Requirement Contracts and Mutuality original
    • 4.11.1: Requirement Contracts and Mutuality Introduction original
    • 4.11.2: Great Northern Ry. v. Witham original
    • 4.11.3: Note - Great Northern Ry. v. Witham original
    • 4.11.4: Westesen v. Olathe State Bank original
    • 4.11.5: Note - Westesen v. Olathe State Bank original
    • 4.11.6: Swindell & Co. v. First National Bank original
    • 4.11.7: Notes - Swindell & Co. v. First National Bank original
    • 4.11.8: Lima Locomotive & Machine Co. v. National Steel Castings Co. original
    • 4.11.9: Eastern Air Lines Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp. original
    • 4.11.10: Utah International, Inc. v. Colorado-Ute Elec. Assn. Inc. original
    • 4.11.11: Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Cooper’s Glue Factory original
    • 4.11.12: Notes - Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Cooper’s Glue Factory original
    • 4.12: “Instinct with an Obligation” original
    • 4.12.1: “Instinct with an Obligation” Introduction original
    • 4.12.2: Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon original
    • 4.12.3: Notes - Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon original
    • 4.12.4: Hammond v. C.I.T. Financial Corp. original
    • 4.12.5: Notes - Hammond v. C.I.T. Financial Corp. original
    • 4.12.6: Sylvan Crest Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States original
    • 4.12.7: Notes - Sylvan Crest Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States original
    • 4.12.8: Carlton v. Smith original
    • 4.12.9: Notes - Carlton v. Smith original
    • 4.12.10: Reinert v. Lawson original
    • 4.12.11: Notes - Reinert v. Lawson original
    • 4.12.12: Bernstein v. W. B. Manufacturing Co. original
    • 4.12.13: Notes - Bernstein v. W. B. Manufacturing Co. original
    • 4.12.14: Gurfein v. Werbelovsky original
    • 4.12.15: Notes - Gurfein v. Werbelovsky original
    • 4.13: The Gratuitous Noncommercial Promise original
    • 4.13.1: The Gratuitous Noncommercial Promise Introduction original
    • 4.13.2: 1 Williston on Contracts §112, p. 445 (3d ed. 1957) original
    • 4.13.3: Notes - 1 Williston on Contracts §112, p. 445 (3d ed. 1957) original
    • 4.13.4: Kirksey v. Kirksey original
    • 4.13.5: Notes - Kirksey v. Kirksey original
    • 4.13.6: Forward v. Armstead original
    • 4.13.7: Notes - Forward v. Armstead original
    • 4.13.8: Seavey v. Drake original
    • 4.13.9: Notes - Seavey v. Drake original
    • 4.13.10: Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks original
    • 4.13.11: Notes - Roberts-Horsfield v. Gedicks original
    • 4.13.12: Devecmon v. Shaw original
    • 4.13.13: Notes - Devecmon v. Shaw original
    • 4.13.14: Hamer v. Sidway original
    • 4.13.15: Notes - Hamer v. Sidway original
    • 4.13.16: Ricketts v. Scothorn original
    • 4.13.17: Notes - Ricketts v. Scothorn original
    • 4.13.18: De Cicco v. Schweizer original
    • 4.13.19: Notes - De Cicco v. Schweizer original
    • 4.13.20: Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank of Jamestown original
    • 4.13.21: Notes - Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank of Jamestown original
    • 4.14: Moral Consideration original
    • 4.14.1: Moral Consideration Introduction original
    • 4.14.2: Gillingham v. Brown original
    • 4.14.3: Notes - Gillingham v. Brown original
    • 4.14.4: Lampleigh v. Brathwait original
    • 4.14.5: Notes - Lampleigh v. Brathwait original
    • 4.14.6: Eastwood v. Kenyon original
    • 4.14.7: Notes - Eastwood v. Kenyon original
    • 4.14.8: MILLS v. WYMAN. original
    • 4.14.9: Notes - MILLS v. WYMAN original
    • 4.14.10: C________ v. W________ original
    • 4.14.11: Notes - C._________ v. W.___________ original
    • 4.14.12: Perreault v. Hall original
    • 4.14.13: Notes - Perreault v. Hall original
    • 4.14.14: In re Schoenkerman’s Estate original
    • 4.14.15: Notes - In re Schoenkerman’s Estate original
    • 4.14.16: Elbinger v. Capitol & Teutonia Co. original
    • 4.14.17: Notes - Elbinger v. Capitol & Teutonia Co. original
    • 4.14.18: Webb v. McGowin original
    • 4.14.19: Webb v. McGowin (Alabama Supreme Court) original
    • 4.14.20: Notes - Webb v. McGowin (Alabama Supreme Court) original
    • 4.14.21: Medberry v. Olcovich original
    • 4.14.22: Notes - Medberry v. Olcovich original
    • 4.14.23: Lawrence v. Oglesby original
    • 4.14.24: New York General Obligations Law §5-1105 original
    • 4.14.25: Statutory Provisions original
    • 4.14.26: Notes - New York General Obligations Law §5-1105 original
    • 4.14.27: California Civil Code (1872) §1606 original
    • 4.14.28: Notes - California Civil Code (1872) §1606 original
    • 4.14.29: Georgia Code Annotated §20-303 original
    • 4.14.30: Restatement of Contracts Second original
    • 5: Chapter 4: Fairness of the Bargain and Equality: The Idea of Justice in Exchange original
    • 5.1: Bargaining and Economic Liberty original
    • 5.1.1: Bargaining and Economic Liberty Introduction original
    • 5.1.2: Cohen, The Basis of Contract, 46 Harv. L. Rev. 553, 581, 582 (1933) original
    • 5.1.3: Note, The Peppercorn Theory of Consideration and the Doctrine of Fair Exchange in Contract Law, 35 Colum. L. Rev. 1090, 1090-1091 (1935) original
    • 5.1.4: Haigh v. Brooks original
    • 5.1.5: Cook v. Wright original
    • 5.1.6: Notes - Cook v. Wright original
    • 5.1.7: Jackson v. Seymour original
    • 5.1.8: Notes - Jackson v. Seymour original
    • 5.1.9: Marks v. Gates original
    • 5.1.10: Notes - Marks v. Gates original
    • 5.1.11: Embola v. Tuppela original
    • 5.1.12: Notes - United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. original
    • 5.1.13: United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. original
    • 5.2: Consumer Protection: Unconscionability and Beyond original
    • 5.2.1: Consumer Protection: Unconscionability and Beyond Introduction original
    • 5.2.2: AMERICAN HOME IMPROVEMENT, INC. v. MACIVER original
    • 5.2.3: Notes - American Home Improvement Co. v. MacIver original
    • 5.2.4: WILLIAMS v. WALKER-THOMAS FURNITURE CO. original
    • 5.2.5: Notes - Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. original
    • 5.2.6: Patterson v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. original
    • 5.2.7: Notes - Patterson v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. original
    • 5.2.8: Jones v. Star Credit Corp. original
    • 5.2.9: Notes - Jones v. Star Credit Corp. original
    • 5.2.10: Kugler v. Romain original
    • 5.2.11: Notes - Kugler v. Romain original
    • 5.3: Freedom of Contract in the Field of Private Insurance original
    • 5.3.1: Freedom of Contract in the Field of Private Insurance original
    • 5.4: Franchises and the New Feudalism original
    • 5.4.1: Franchises and the New Feudalism original
    • 5.5: The Classical Struggle Between Creditor and Debtor: Readjustment of a Going Business Deal and Discharge original
    • 5.5.1: The Classical Struggle Between Creditor and Debtor: Readjustment of a Going Business Deal and Discharge Introduction original
    • 5.5.2: Stilk v. Myrick original
    • 5.5.3: Notes - Stilk v. Myrick original
    • 5.5.4: Lingenfelder v. The Wainwright Brewing Co. original
    • 5.5.5: Notes - Lingenfelder v. The Wainwright Brewing Co. original
    • 5.5.6: Goebel v. Linn original
    • 5.5.7: Notes - Goebel v. Linn original
    • 5.5.8: Austin Instrument Inc. v. Loral Corp. original
    • 5.5.9: Notes - Austin Instrument Inc. v. Loral Corp. original
    • 5.5.10: Schwartzreich v. Bauman-Basch, Inc. original
    • 5.5.11: Central London Property Trust, Ltd. v. High Trees House, Ltd. original
    • 5.5.12: Notes - Central London Property Trust, Ltd. v. High Trees House, Ltd. original
    • 5.5.13: Skinner v. Tober Foreign Motors Inc. original
    • 5.5.14: Notes - Skinner v. Tober Foreign Motors Inc. original
    • 5.5.15: Foakes v. Beer original
    • 5.5.16: Notes - Foakes v. Beer original
    • 5.5.17: Hackley v. Headley original
    • 5.5.18: Notes - Hackley v. Headley original
    • 5.5.19: Mitchell v. C. C. Sanitation Co. original
    • 5.5.20: Fitts v. Panhandle & S. F. RY. original
    • 5.5.21: Notes - Fitts v. Panhandle & S. F. RY. original
    • 5.5.22: Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R.R. original
    • 5.5.23: Consolidated Edison Co. v. Arroll original
    • 5.5.24: Notes - Consolidated Edison Co. v. Arroll original
    • 5.5.25: Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co., Inc. original
    • 5.5.26: Petterson v. Pattberg original
    • 5.5.27: Notes - Petterson v. Pattberg original
    • 5.5.28: Goldbard v. Empire State Mutual Life Insurance Co. original
    • 5.5.29: Notes - Goldbard v. Empire State Mutual Life Insurance Co. original
    • 5.5.30: Boshart v. Gardner original
    • 5.5.31: Notes - Boshart v. Gardner original
    • 6: Chapter 5: Formalism in Our Law of Contracts original
    • 6.1: The Peppercorn Theory of Consideration original
    • 6.1.1: Formalism in Our Law of Contracts original
    • 6.1.2: Cohen, The Basis of Contract, 46 Harv. L. Rev. 553, 582-583 (1933) original
    • 6.1.3: Fuller, Consideration and Form, 41 Colum. L. Rev. 799, 799-800 (1941) original
    • 6.1.4: Notes - Fuller, Consideration and Form, 41 Colum. L. Rev. 799, 799-800 (1941) original
    • 6.1.5: Sir Anthony Sturlyn v. Albany original
    • 6.1.6: Whitney v. Stearns original
    • 6.1.7: W. H. Page, The Law of Contracts §646 (1920) original
    • 6.1.8: Thomas v. Thomas original
    • 6.1.9: Notes - Thomas v. Thomas original
    • 6.1.10: Fischer v. Union Trust Co. original
    • 6.1.11: Notes - Fischer v. Union Trust Co. original
    • 6.1.12: Murphy, Thompson & Co. v. Reed original
    • 6.1.13: Notes - Murphy, Thompson & Co. v. Reed original
    • 6.1.14: Real Estate Co. of Pittsburgh v. Rudolph original
    • 6.1.15: Notes - Real Estate Co. of Pittsburgh v. Rudolph original
    • 6.1.16: Marsh v. Lott original
    • 6.1.17: Notes - Marsh v. Lott original
    • 6.1.18: Wheat v. Morse original
    • 6.2: The Seal and the Written Obligation original
    • 6.2.1: J. Ames, Lectures on Legal History 98-99, 104-106 (1913) original
    • 6.2.2: Warren v. Lynch original
    • 6.2.3: Notes - Warren v. Lynch original
    • 6.2.4: Krell v. Codman original
    • 6.2.5: Goulet v. Goulet original
    • 6.2.6: Aller v. Aller original
    • 6.2.7: Notes - Aller v. Aller original
    • 6.2.8: Schnell v. Nell original
    • 6.2.9: Notes - Schnell v. Nell original
    • 6.2.10: Cochran v. Taylor original
    • 6.2.11: Notes - Cochran v. Taylor original
    • 6.2.12: Pillans and Rose v. Van Mierop and Hopkins original
    • 6.2.13: Notes - Pillans and Rose v. Van Mierop and Hopkins original
    • 6.2.14: Uniform Written Obligations Act original
    • 6.2.15: Notes - Uniform Written Obligations Act original
    • 7: Chapter 6: More About Formalism: The Statute of Frauds original
    • 7.1: Introductory Note original
    • 7.1.1: More About Formalism: The Statute of Frauds Introduction original
    • 7.1.2: Introductory Note - An Act for Prevention of Frauds and Perjuries, St. 29 Car. II, C.3. original
    • 7.2: The Transaction Affected original
    • 7.2.1: Lawrence v. Anderson original
    • 7.2.2: Notes - Lawrence v. Anderson original
    • 7.2.3: Eastwood v. Kenyon original
    • 7.2.4: Notes - Eastwood v. Kenyon original
    • 7.2.5: Taylor v. Lee original
    • 7.2.6: Notes - Taylor v. Lee original
    • 7.2.7: Witschard v. A. Brody & Sons, Inc. original
    • 7.2.8: Notes - Witschard v. A. Brody & Sons, Inc. original
    • 7.2.9: Colpitts v. L. C. Fisher Co. original
    • 7.2.10: Notes - Colpitts v. L. C. Fisher Co. original
    • 7.2.11: Bader v. Hiscox original
    • 7.2.12: Notes - Bader v. Hiscox original
    • 7.2.13: Doyle v. Dixon original
    • 7.2.14: Notes - Doyle v. Dixon original
    • 7.2.15: Harvey v. J. P. Morgan & Co. original
    • 7.2.16: Notes - Harvey v. J. P. Morgan & Co. original
    • 7.2.17: Montuori v. Bailen original
    • 7.2.18: Notes - Montuori v. Bailen original
    • 7.2.19: Uniform Commercial Code §2-201 original
    • 7.2.20: Notes - Uniform Commercial Code §2-201 original
    • 7.2.21: Amsinck v. American Insurance Co. original
    • 7.2.22: Notes - Amsinck v. American Insurance Co. original
    • 7.3: Compliance with the Statute original
    • 7.3.1: Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp. original
    • 7.3.2: Notes - Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp. original
    • 7.3.3: Hughes v. Payne original
    • 7.3.4: Notes - Hughes v. Payne original
    • 7.3.5: Baldridge v. Centgraf original
    • 7.3.6: Notes - Baldridge v. Centgraf original
    • 7.3.7: Ablett v. Sencer original
    • 7.3.8: Notes - Ablett v. Sencer original
    • 7.3.9: Cash v. Clark original
    • 7.3.10: Notes - Cash v. Clark original
    • 7.3.11: Harry Rubin & Sons, Inc. v. Consolidated Pipe Co. of America, Inc. original
    • 7.3.12: Notes - Harry Rubin Sons, Inc. v. Consolidated Pipe Co. of America, Inc. original
    • 7.4: Counterrules: Estoppel and Restitution original
    • 7.4.1: Imperator Realty Co., Inc. v. Tull original
    • 7.4.2: Notes - Imperator Realty Co., Inc. v. Tull original
    • 7.4.3: Boone v. Coe original
    • 7.4.4: Alaska Airlines v. Stephenson original
    • 7.4.5: Notes - Boone v. Coe original
    • 7.4.6: Notes - Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Stephenson original
    • 8: Chapter 7: The Parol Evidence Rule original
    • 8.1: Introductory Note original
    • 8.1.1: Chapter 7: The Parol Evidence Rule Introduction original
    • 8.1.2: Introductory Note original
    • 8.1.3: Corbin, The Parole Evidence Rule original
    • 8.1.4: Notes - Corbin, The Parole Evidence Rule original
    • 8.2: The Circle of Interpretation original
    • 8.2.1: Thompson v. Libby original
    • 8.2.2: Notes - Thompson v. Libby original
    • 8.2.3: Pym v. Campbell original
    • 8.2.4: Crawford v. France original
    • 8.2.5: Notes - Crawford v. France original
    • 8.2.6: Mitchill v. Lath original
    • 8.2.7: Notes - Mitchill v. Lath original
    • 8.2.8: Uniform Commercial Code §2-202 original
    • 8.2.9: Notes - Uniform Commercial Code §2-202 original
    • 8.2.10: Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris original
    • 8.2.11: Notes - Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris original
    • 8.2.12: Hurst v. Lake Co., Inc. original
    • 8.2.13: Notes - Hurst v. Lake Co., Inc. original
    • 8.2.14: Zell v. American Seating Co. original
    • 8.2.15: American Seating Co. v. Zell original
    • 9: Chapter 8: Reality and Illusion (Herein of the Doctrines of Mistake, Impossibility, and Frustration) original
    • 9.1: Introductory Note original
    • 9.1.1: Introductory Note original
    • 9.2: The Unruliness of Words original
    • 9.2.1: The Unruliness of Words Introduction original
    • 9.2.2: Hotchkiss v. National City Bank of New York original
    • 9.2.3: Williston on Contracts §95 original
    • 9.2.4: Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R.R. (Frank, J., concurring) original
    • 9.2.5: Notes - Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R.R. (Frank, J., concurring) original
    • 9.2.6: Raffles v. Wichelhaus original
    • 9.2.7: Notes - Raffles v. Wichelhaus original
    • 9.2.8: Miller v. Stanich original
    • 9.2.9: Notes - Miller v. Stanich original
    • 9.2.10: Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R.R. original
    • 9.2.11: Notes - Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R.R. original
    • 9.3: “The Value of a Thing Is Just Exactly What ‘Twill Bring” original
    • 9.3.1: “The Value of a Thing Is Just Exactly What ‘Twill Bring.” original
    • 9.3.2: Wood v. Boynton original
    • 9.3.3: Sherwood v. Walker original
    • 9.3.4: Notes - Sherwood v. Walker original
    • 9.3.5: McRae v. Commonwealth Disposals Commission original
    • 9.3.6: Notes - McRae v. Commonwealth Disposals Commission original
    • 9.4: The Vanishing Synthesis (England) original
    • 9.4.1: The Vanishing Synthesis (England) Introduction original
    • 9.4.2: Paradine v. Jane original
    • 9.4.3: Notes - Paradine v. Jane original
    • 9.4.4: Savile v. Savile original
    • 9.4.5: Notes - Savile v. Savile original
    • 9.4.6: Hall v. Wright original
    • 9.4.7: Notes - Hall v. Wright original
    • 9.4.8: Taylor v. Caldwell original
    • 9.4.9: Notes - Taylor v. Caldwell original
    • 9.4.10: Krell v. Henry original
    • 9.4.11: Notes - Krell v. Henry original
    • 9.4.12: Chandler v. Webster original
    • 9.4.13: Notes - Chandler v. Webster original
    • 9.4.14: Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v. Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour, Ltd. original
    • 9.4.15: Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act, 1943 original
    • 9.4.16: Notes - Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act, 1943 original
    • 9.5: The Vanishing Synthesis (United States) original
    • 9.5.1: School Trustees of Trenton v. Bennett original
    • 9.5.2: Notes - School Trustees of Trenton v. Bennett original
    • 9.5.3: BUTTERFIELD. v. BYRON. original
    • 9.5.4: Notes - Butterfield v. Byron original
    • 9.5.5: Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Dunbar Molasses Co. original
    • 9.5.6: Notes - Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Dunbar Molasses Co. original
    • 9.5.7: LLOYD v. MURPHY original
    • 9.5.8: Notes - Lloyd v. Murphy original
    • 9.5.9: American Trading & Production Corp. v. Shell International Marine Ltd. original
    • 9.5.10: Notes - American Trading & Production Corp. v. Shell International Marine Ltd. original
    • 9.5.11: Note on the Restatements of Contracts and the Uniform Commercial Code original
    • 10: Chapter 9: Protection of the Exchange Relationship (Herein the Theory of Conditions) original
    • 10.1: Introductory Note original
    • 10.1.1: Introductory Note original
    • 10.2: The Basic Themes: Some History by Way of Background original
    • 10.2.1: Nichols v. Raynbred original
    • 10.2.2: Pordage v. Cole original
    • 10.2.3: Notes - Pordage v. Cole original
    • 10.2.4: Kingston v. Preston original
    • 10.2.5: Notes - Kingston v. Preston original
    • 10.2.6: Boone v. Eyre original
    • 10.2.7: Notes - Boone v. Eyre original
    • 10.2.8: Note on the Historical Development of the Law of Conditions original
    • 10.3: The Sale of Goods: A Case Study in the Implication of Conditions original
    • 10.3.1: Norrington v. Wright original
    • 10.3.2: Notes - Norrington v. Wright original
    • 10.3.3: Note on the Uniform Commercial Code and the Perfect Tender Rule original
    • 10.3.4: Miron v. Yonkers Raceway, Inc. original
    • 10.3.5: Notes - Miron v. Yonkers Raceway, Inc. original
    • 10.3.6: Maurice O’Meara Co. v. National Park Bank of New York original
    • 10.3.7: Notes - Maurice O’Meara Co. v. National Park Bank of New York original
    • 10.3.8: O. W. Holmes, The Path of the Law original
    • 10.4: The Problems of Forfeiture original
    • 10.4.1: Britton v. Turner original
    • 10.4.2: Notes - Britton v. Turner original
    • 10.4.3: Smith v. Brady original
    • 10.4.4: Notes - Smith v. Brady original
    • 10.4.5: Avery v. Wilson original
    • 10.4.6: Clark v. West original
    • 10.4.7: Notes - Clark v. West original
    • 10.4.8: Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent original
    • 10.4.9: Notes - Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent original
    • 10.4.10: Lawrence v. Miller original
    • 10.4.11: Amtorg Trading Corp. v. Miehle Printing Press & Manufacturing Co. original
    • 10.4.12: Notes - Amtorg Trading Corp. v. Miehle Printing Press & Manufacturing Co. original
    • 11: Chapter 10: Remedies original
    • 11.1: Introduction original
    • 11.1.1: Remedies Introduction original
    • 11.1.2: Acme Mills & Elevator Co v. Johnson original
    • 11.1.3: O. W. Holmes, The Common Law 234-236 (M. Howe ed. 1963) original
    • 11.1.4: E. A. Harriman, The Law of Contracts §§551-552 (2d ed. 1901) original
    • 11.2: Specific Performance and the Right to Break a Contract original
    • 11.2.1: Specific Performance and the Right to Break a Contract Introduction original
    • 11.2.2: Lumley v. Wagner original
    • 11.2.3: Notes - Lumley v. Wagner original
    • 11.2.4: Stokes v. Moore original
    • 11.2.5: Notes - Stokes v. Moore original
    • 11.2.6: City Stores Co. v. Ammerman original
    • 11.2.7: Notes - City Stores Co. v. Ammerman original
    • 11.2.8: Campbell Soup Co. v. Wentz original
    • 11.2.9: Uniform Commercial Code §2-716 original
    • 11.2.10: Notes - Uniform Commercial Code §2-716 original
    • 11.2.11: Grossfeld, Money Sanctions for Breach of Contract in a Communist Economy, 72 Yale L.J. 1326, 1330-1332 (1963) original
    • 11.3: Money Damages: The Limits of Compensation original
    • 11.3.1: Money Damages: The Limits of Compensation Introduction original
    • 11.3.2: Sedgwick, On the Measure of Damages original
    • 11.3.3: Freund v. Washington Square Press, Inc. original
    • 11.3.4: Notes - Freund v. Washington Square Press original
    • 11.3.5: Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent original
    • 11.3.6: Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co. original
    • 11.3.7: Notes - Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal & Mining Co. original
    • 11.3.8: Gainsford v. Carroll original
    • 11.3.9: Notes - Gainsford v. Carroll original
    • 11.3.10: Uniform Commercial Code §§ 2-706, 2-708, 2-710, 2-712, 2-713, 2-715 original
    • 11.3.11: Panhandle Agri-Service, Inc. v. Becker original
    • 11.3.12: Notes - Panhandle Agri-Service Inc. v. Becker original
    • 11.3.13: Hadley v. Baxendale original
    • 11.3.14: Notes - Hadley v. Baxendale original
    • 11.3.15: Danzig, Hadley v. Baxendale: A Study in the Industrialization of the Law original
    • 11.3.16: Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co. original
    • 11.3.17: Notes - Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co. original
    • 11.3.18: Kerr Steamship Co., Inc. v. Radio Corp. America original
    • 11.3.19: Notes - Kerr S.S. Co., Inc. v. Radio Corporation of America original
    • 11.3.20: The Heron II (Kaufos v. C. Czarnikow, Ltd.) original
    • 11.3.21: Notes - The Heron II (Kaufos v. C. Czarnikow, Ltd.) original
    • 11.3.22: Neri v. Retail Marine Corp. original
    • 11.3.23: Notes - Neri v. Retail Marine Corp. original
    • 11.3.24: Fuller & Perdue, The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages original
    • 11.3.25: U.S. v. Behan original
    • 11.3.26: Notes - United States v. Behan original
    • 11.3.27: Kehoe v. Rutherford original
    • 11.3.28: Philadelphia v. Tripple original
    • 11.3.29: Notes - Philadelphia v. Tripple original
    • 11.3.30: Security Stove & Mfg. Co. v. American Ry. Express Co. original
    • 11.3.31: Notes - Security Stove & Mfg. Co. v. American Ry. Express Co. original
    • 11.3.32: L. Albert & Son v. Armstrong Rubber Co. original
    • 11.3.33: Notes - L. Albert & Son v. Armstrong Rubber Co. original
    • 11.4: Freedom of Contract and the Judicial Prerogative: The Power of the Parties to Control Remedy and Risk original
    • 11.4.1: Freedom of Contract and the Judicial Prerogative: The Power of the Parties to Control Remedy and Risk Introduction original
    • 11.4.2: Nute v. Hamilton Mutual Insurance Co. original
    • 11.4.3: Notes - Nute v. Hamilton Mutual Insurance Co. original
    • 11.4.4: Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc. original
    • 11.4.5: Notes - Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc. original
    • 11.4.6: Kemble v. Farren original
    • 11.4.7: McCarthy v. Tally original
    • 11.4.8: Notes - McCarthy v. Tally original
    • 11.4.9: Klar v. H. & M. Parcel Room, Inc. original
    • 11.4.10: Notes - Klar v. H. & M. Parcel Room, Inc. original
    • 11.4.11: Uniform Commercial Code §§2-718, 2-719 original
    • 11.4.12: Notes - Uniform Commercial Code §§2-718, 2-719 original
    • 11.4.13: Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. original
    • 11.4.14: Notes - Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. original
    • 11.4.15: Uniform Commercial Code §2-316 original
    • 11.4.16: Notes - Uniform Commercial Code §2-316 original
    • 11.4.17: Fair v. Negley original
    • 11.4.18: Notes - Fair v. Negley original
    • 11.5: The Burdens of Innocence: Anticipatory Repudiation and the Duty to Mitigate Damages original
    • 11.5.1: The Burdens of Innocence: Anticipatory Repudiation and the Duty to Mitigate Damages Introduction original
    • 11.5.2: Daniels v. Newton original
    • 11.5.3: Notes - Daniels v. Newton original
    • 11.5.4: Roehm v. Horst original
    • 11.5.5: Notes - Roehm v. Horst original
    • 11.5.6: Roehm v. Horst (further note on case) original
    • 11.5.7: Phelps v. Herro original
    • 11.5.8: Notes - Phelps v. Herro original
    • 11.5.9: Missouri Furnace Co. v. Cochran original
    • 11.5.10: Notes - Missouri Furnace Co. v. Cochran original
    • 11.5.11: Uniform Commercial Code §§2-610, 2-611 original
    • 11.5.12: Notes - Uniform Commercial Code §§2-610, 2-611 original
    • 11.5.13: Oloffson v. Coomer original
    • 11.5.14: Notes - Oloffson v. Coomer original
    • 11.5.15: Clark v. Marsiglia original
    • 11.5.16: Notes - Clark v. Marsiglia original
    • 11.5.17: Mount Pleasant Stable Co. v. Steinberg original
    • 11.5.18: Jameson v. Board of Education. original
    • 11.5.19: Notes - Jameson v. Board of Education original
    • 11.5.20: LOUISE CAROLINE NURSING HOME, INC. v. DIX CONSTRUCTION CORP. original
    • 11.5.21: Notes - Louise Caroline Nursing Home, Inc. v. Dix Construction Co. original
    • 12: Chapter 11: Third Party Beneficiaries original
    • 12.1: Introductory Note original
    • 12.1.1: Introductory Note original
    • 12.2: The Origins: Cross-Currents of Doctrine original
    • 12.2.1: Lawrence v. Fox original
    • 12.2.2: Notes - Lawrence v. Fox original
    • 12.2.3: Vrooman v. Turner original
    • 12.2.4: Notes - Vrooman v. Turner original
    • 12.2.5: Seaver v. Ransom original
    • 12.2.6: Notes - Seaver v. Ransom original
    • 12.3: The Search for Doctrinal Clarity original
    • 12.3.1: The Search for Doctrinal Clarity Introduction original
    • 12.3.2: Socony-Vacuum Oil Company v. Continental Casualty Company original
    • 12.3.3: Notes - Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co. original
    • 12.3.4: Lucas v. Hamm original
    • 12.3.5: Notes - Lucas v. Hamm original
    • 12.3.6: Isbrandtsen Co. v. Local 1291, of International Longshoremen's Assn. original
    • 12.3.7: Notes - Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. Local 1291 of International Longshoremen’s Assn. original
    • 12.4: Government Contracts and Citizen Beneficiaries original
    • 12.4.1: Government Contracts and Citizen Beneficiaries Introduction original
    • 12.4.2: Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co. original
    • 12.4.3: Notes - H. R. Moch Co., Inc. v. Rensselaer Water Co. original
    • 12.4.4: Martinez v. Socoma Companies, Inc. original
    • 12.4.5: Notes - Martinez v. Socoma Companies, Inc. original
    • 12.4.6: Holbrook v. Pitt original
    • 12.4.7: Notes - Holbrook v. Pitt original
    • 12.4.8: Waters, The Property in the Promise: A Study of the Third Party Beneficiary Rule. 98 Harv. L. Rev. 1109, 1192-1199 (1985) original
    • 12.5: The Problem of Defenses, Modifications, and Rescission original
    • 12.5.1: The Problem of Defenses, Modifications, and Rescission Introduction original
    • 12.5.2: Ford v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York original
    • 12.5.3: Copeland v. Beard original
    • 12.5.4: Note on The Restatement of Contracts and the Problem of Rescission original
    • 12.5.5: Notes - Note on The Restatement of Contracts and the Problem of Rescission original
    • 12.5.6: ROUSE v. UNITED STATES original
    • 12.5.7: Notes - ROUSE v. UNITED STATES original
    • 12.5.8: Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp. original
    • 12.5.9: Notes - Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp. original
    • 13: Chapter 12: Assignment: The Liquidity of Contractual Obligations original
    • 13.1: Introductory Note original
    • 13.1.1: Introductory Note - G. Gilmore, Security Interests in Personal Property §7.3 (1965) original
    • 13.2: Intangible Claims and Their Transferability original
    • 13.2.1: Muller v. Pondir original
    • 13.2.2: Notes - Muller v. Pondir original
    • 13.2.3: Shiro v. Drew original
    • 13.2.4: Notes - Shiro v. Drew original
    • 13.2.5: In re Dodge-Freedman Poultry Co. original
    • 13.2.6: Notes - In re Dodge-Freedman Poultry Co. original
    • 13.2.7: Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. original
    • 13.2.8: Notes - Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp original
    • 13.3: The Present Assignability of Future Claims original
    • 13.3.1: Rockmore v. Lehman original
    • 13.3.2: Rockmore v. Lehman original
    • 13.3.3: Notes - Rockmore v. Lehman original
    • 13.3.4: In re City of New York v. Bedford Bar & Grill, Inc. original
    • 13.3.5: Notes - In re City of New York v. Bedford Bar & Grill, Inc. original
    • 13.3.6: Speelman v. Pascal original
    • 13.3.7: Notes - Speelman v. Pascal original
    • 13.4: Assignment of Rights vs. Delegation of Duties original
    • 13.4.1: Langel v. Betz original
    • 13.4.2: Notes - Langel v. Betz original
    • 13.4.3: Boston Ice Co. v. Potter original
    • 13.4.4: Notes - Boston Ice Co. v. Potter original
    • 13.4.5: British Waggon Co. v. Lea & Co. original
    • 13.4.6: Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co. original
    • 13.4.7: Notes - Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co. original
    • 13.4.8: Uniform Commercial Code §2-210 original
    • 13.4.9: Notes - Uniform Commercial Code §2-210 original
    • 13.5: The Problem of Defenses, Modifications and Rescission original
    • 13.5.1: Cuban Atlantic Sugar Sales Co. v. Marine Midland Trust Co. N.Y. original
    • 13.5.2: Notes - Cuban Atlantic Sugar Sales Corp. v. The Marine Midland Trust Co. of New York original
    • 13.5.3: Restatement of Contracts Second §336 original
    • 13.5.4: Uniform Commercial Code §9-318 original
    • 13.5.5: Notes - Uniform Commercial Code §9-318 original
    • 13.5.6: Commercial Credit Corp. v. Orange County Machine Works original
    • 13.5.7: Notes - Commercial Credit Corp. v. Orange County Machine Works original
    • 13.5.8: Homer v. Shaw original
    • 13.5.9: Notes - Homer v. Shaw original
    • 13.5.10: Babson v. Village of Ulysses original
    • 13.5.11: Notes - Babson v. Village of Ulysses original
    • 13.6: Priorities original
    • 13.6.1: The Common Law Rules original
    • 13.6.1.1: Dearle v. Hall original
    • 13.6.1.2: Notes - Dearle v. Hall original
    • 13.6.1.3: State Factors Corp. v. Sales Factors Corp. original
    • 13.6.1.4: Notes - State Factors Corp. v. Sales Factors Corp. original
    • 13.6.1.5: Restatement of Contracts Second §342 original
    • 13.6.1.6: Notes - Restatement of Contracts Second §342 original
    • 13.6.2: The Klauder Case and the End of the Common Law Priority Rules original
    • 13.6.2.1: G. Gilmore, Security Interests in personal Property §25.7 (1965) original
    • 13.6.2.2: Notes - 2 G. Gilmore, Security Interests in personal Property §25.7 (1965) original
    • 13.6.3: Priorities under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code original
    • 13.6.3.1: Priorities under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code original